Log of summarizing the results of the department. Combat training management

Tourism and recreation - 08/23/2019

Each aspect of a company’s life has its own method of summing up results. Here is a technique for military discipline.

The state of military discipline is summed up:

Squad commanders with subordinates- for each soldier (the tasks that were performed during the day are analyzed, the personal contribution of each person to the accomplishment of the tasks of the department is noted, a personal assessment is given for the performance and discipline of each subordinate);

Platoon commanders- with platoon personnel and separately with sergeants:

with personnel attention is paid to the following issues:

tasks performed during the day;
the personal contribution of each soldier to the accomplishment of the platoon’s tasks,
issuing a personal assessment for performance and discipline;
violations of military discipline, their causes;
examples of exemplary performance of official duties;
the place of each department is determined;
assigned tasks to the personnel for the next day;

with sergeants their performance of functional duties is analyzed and tasks are set for the next day;

2. Classification and systematization of violations of military discipline, events, crimes. The initial data is:

official, official and socio-demographic data on personnel;
distribution of military personnel by periods of service and military specialties;
place and time of violations of military discipline: during combat training, during household work, on pre-weekend and departure days, in the evening and at night, etc.;
data on violations of military discipline for a certain period of time, and the like.

3. Determining the number and nature of violations of military discipline, incidents, crimes that were committed by different categories of personnel.

4. Grouping of these violations by type and elucidation of their influence on combat and mobilization readiness, the educational process, troop service, the general state of military discipline, and the moral and psychological climate in the unit.

5. For each violation, the commander draws conclusions to make decisions. Questions answered when drawing conclusions

6. Study and analysis of disciplinary offensesAnalysis of misconduct Characteristics of the offense, consequences, reaction of the serviceman. conclusions, the socio-psychological conditions for their commission, allows commanders (chiefs) to obtain objective information about the state of military discipline in the unit, promptly detect the causes of negative trends in military teams, and prepare the necessary data for carrying out effective preventive work in the military environment.

With the personnel of the company (its equal), the results are summed up at the end of each week by category: with officers and warrant officers (midshipmen), sergeants (foremen), with all personnel. The report “On the state of military discipline in the company (its equal) over the past week and the results of work to strengthen it” is usually made by the commander of the company (its equal) or his deputy for educational work.

The report must:

1. State how, in general, the requirements of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, other senior commanders and superiors on strengthening military discipline and improving the service of troops per week are being met, their impact on solving the problems of combat readiness, combat duty, and combat training.

2. Based on the criteria for assessing discipline in the unit, give an assessment to each platoon and section (crew, crew).

3. Mark the units (platoons, squads, crews, crews) in which tasks are better solved, the statutory order is maintained, there are no gross violations of military discipline, a healthy moral and psychological atmosphere, friendship and military camaraderie have developed. At the same time, highlight those units in which these issues have been resolved positively for a long time (indicate which one). Name their commanders and talk about their methods of work. Evaluate the editorial board (at the end of the month) of the wall newspaper on strengthening military discipline.

4. Name military personnel who are an example in the performance of military duty, who provide significant assistance to commanders in maintaining the statutory order, comrades in service, mastering military specialties, who are uncompromising about the shortcomings and unworthy behavior of their colleagues.

5. Bring to the attention of all personnel the names of servicemen who have not shown themselves in any way - neither good nor bad. It is pedagogically correct and tactful to convince them to increase their activity, to explain to them how to choose the right position in life.

6. Name the units (platoons, squads, crews, crews) in which military discipline, law and order and military service do not fully meet the statutory requirements. Particularly point out departments in which for a long time (indicate which) these requirements have been poorly met.

Note the characteristic shortcomings of each of these divisions:

In combat duty, guard and internal services;

In relation to personnel to equipment and weapons, their study, development and conservation;

Internally, following the daily routine;

In compliance with the statutory rules of relations between military personnel;

In fulfilling the class schedule;

According to other parameters.

7. Conduct an in-depth analysis of incidents and crimes, if they occurred, gross disciplinary offenses. Name the names of the servicemen who committed them (ensure that every serviceman, upon hearing his name, stands up and takes a drill stance), inform the personnel: how and why his action had a negative impact on combat readiness. Announce that the discipline of the named military personnel is assessed as “unsatisfactory.” Particularly disclose the cases of the use of obscene words, nicknames and nicknames, distortion of military ranks, rudeness and familiarity.

At the end of summing up, those who distinguished themselves should be encouraged and those who were guilty should be noted for the worse.

After summing up the results, announcing specific assessments to units and rank and file, the commander determines specific tasks for each platoon, squad, crew, crew, individual soldiers (sailors) to eliminate deficiencies and measures that must be carried out in the interests of strengthening military discipline and law and order.

After defining specific tasks, the commander begins to assess the personal discipline of the sergeants (foremen) and their work to strengthen military discipline and law and order.

At the same time, he analyzes:

1) the level of executive discipline among sergeants (foremen), timeliness and quality of executed orders and instructions of senior commanders;

2) personal exemplary character of the sergeants (seniors) in fulfilling the requirements of the regulations and their functional duties;

3) cases of biased reports or concealment of facts of violation of military discipline among subordinates;

4) the role of sergeants (foremen) in maintaining the statutory order in the unit, observing the uniform and daily routine;

5) participation of sergeants (foremen) in disciplinary practice, their compliance with the law and statutory requirements in relations with subordinates;

6) the work of sergeants (foremen) in instilling in their subordinates a love of service, satisfying their needs and requests, training and education.

At the end of the debriefing with the sergeants (seniors), the commander sets specific tasks to strengthen military discipline and law and order among subordinates, pays special attention to the commanders of lagging squads, crews, crews, and at the same time evaluates the personal discipline of each and his work in maintaining the statutory order in the unit.

After defining specific tasks, the commander releases the sergeant (senior sergeant) and evaluates the work of the sergeant major with junior commanders, the completeness of their performance of official duties, points out shortcomings, and sets tasks for the next week.

Personal discipline and the work of the company’s senior technician (if any) are also assessed, especially in preventing accidents and damage to weapons and military equipment, and in fulfilling safety requirements by personnel during operation, repair and maintenance of vehicles.

Having released the warrant officers, the commander evaluates the work of the officers. At the same time, he announces an assessment of the personal behavior of each officer. First, the work of platoon commanders is assessed, and then deputy company commanders (equal). The positions of platoons in a company (equal to it) are determined, omissions and shortcomings in strengthening military discipline among subordinates are noted. An assessment is made of the use of disciplinary practices by officers in the interests of strengthening military discipline. In conclusion, the company commander (its equal) sets tasks that relate to the personal work of the officers.

Summing up the results of military discipline and law and order in the company for a month can be carried out at a general meeting of the company’s military personnel (with the invitation of senior commanders). At the meeting, a resolution is adopted that defines measures to strengthen military discipline for the next month.

Company commanders (their equals) must have a special notebook with materials for analyzing and summing up military discipline.

It is impossible to analyze and evaluate the state of military discipline in subordinate units by the number of disciplinary sanctions imposed on military personnel. This undermines the authority of demanding, strong-willed commanders.

It is advisable to analyze the state of law and order and military discipline in the unit using the proposed methodology weekly on Fridays, followed by completion of conclusions and planned activities at the meeting.

The depth, comprehensiveness and systematicity of the analysis of law and order and military discipline allows us to correctly see and evaluate the results of educational work, its positive and negative aspects, prospects and trends in the struggle for its further strengthening and order in units.

More on the topic: Methodology for summing up law and order and military discipline:

Basic forms of educational work to strengthen law and order and military discipline
Organization of work to strengthen law and order and military discipline
Functional responsibilities (work system) of the group commander for organizing the education of personnel, maintaining law and order and military discipline
Functional responsibilities (work system) of a course officer for organizing the education of personnel, maintaining law and order and military discipline

With the personnel of the company and battery, the results are summed up at the end of each week by category: with officers and warrant officers, non-commissioned officers, and all personnel. As a rule, the company commander makes a report “On the state of military discipline in the company over the past week and the results of work to strengthen it.” The report must:

Explain how, in general, the requirements of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation, other commanders and superiors regarding strengthening military discipline and improving the service of troops per week are met, determine their impact on solving the problems of combat readiness, combat duty, and combat training.

Assess the state of discipline in each platoon and section (crew, crew)

Highlight the units (platoons, squads, crews, crews) in which tasks are better solved, the statutory order is maintained, there are no gross violations of military discipline, a healthy moral and psychological atmosphere has developed, relations of friendship and military camaraderie. At the same time, highlight those units in which these issues for a long time (specify which) they decide positively to name their commanders and talk about their methods of work. Assess the work of the editorial board (at the end of the month) of wall newspapers to strengthen military discipline.

Name military personnel who are an example in fulfilling the Military Oath, who provide significant assistance to commanders in maintaining the statutory order, comrades in service, mastering military specialties, who are uncompromising about the shortcomings and unworthy behavior of their colleagues.

Bring to the attention of all personnel the names of servicemen who have not shown themselves in any way - neither good nor bad. It is pedagogically correct and tactful to convince them to increase their activity, to explain to them how to choose the right position in life.

Name the units (platoons, squads, crews, crews) in which military discipline, law and order and military service do not fully meet the statutory requirements. Particularly point out departments in which for a long time (indicate which) these requirements have been poorly met. Note the characteristic shortcomings of each of these divisions:

in performing combat duty;

in relation to personnel to equipment and weapons, their study, development and conservation;

in serving on guard, daily duty;

in internal order, following the daily routine;

in compliance with the statutory rules of relations between military personnel;

in fulfilling the class schedule;

according to other parameters.

Conduct an in-depth analysis of incidents and crimes, if they occurred, and gross disciplinary offenses. Name the names of the servicemen who committed them (each serviceman, upon hearing his name, must stand up and take a drill stance), report to all personnel how and why his action had a negative impact on combat readiness. Announce that the discipline of the named military personnel is assessed as “unsatisfactory.” Particularly disclose the cases of the use of obscene words, nicknames, nicknames, distortion of military ranks, rudeness and familiarity.

At the end of summing up, those who distinguished themselves should be encouraged and those who were guilty should be noted for the worse.

At the end of the debriefing, the commander determines specific tasks for each platoon, squad, crew, crew, individual soldiers (whose discipline is rated “unsatisfactory”) to eliminate deficiencies and activities that subordinate commanders must carry out in the interests of strengthening military discipline and law and order.

Bringing military personnel of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation to disciplinary liability

Disciplinary liability is a legal liability that arises for the commission of a disciplinary offense by military personnel and is exercised by the authority of the commander (chief) in an official capacity according to the rules of the Disciplinary Charter of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation.

Military personnel bear disciplinary responsibility for:

Misdemeanors related to violation of military discipline or public order (Federal Law “On the Status of Military Personnel”);

Misdemeanors related to violation of moral standards and military honor (Article 23 of the Criminal Code of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation).

Stages of bringing military personnel to disciplinary liability.

detection and suppression of disciplinary offenses;

appointment of proceedings;

conducting proceedings on the fact of a disciplinary offense;

reviewing the collected evidence and making a decision to impose a disciplinary sanction;

imposition of disciplinary action.

Before bringing a serviceman to disciplinary liability, it is necessary to make sure that his offense contains the elements of a disciplinary offense, which is characterized by a set of elements (signs) provided for by law, indicating the object, objective side, subject and subjective side of this type of offense.

The object of a disciplinary offense is those social relations that are regulated by the rules of military discipline, or relations in the sphere of public order.

The objective side of a disciplinary offense is expressed in certain actions and inactions that are socially dangerous and illegal.

The subjective side is expressed in the mental attitude of the offender to his illegal act and its consequences. This is the fault of the serviceman, which is a necessary condition for disciplinary liability.

A serviceman can be brought to disciplinary liability only if all the elements of a disciplinary offense are present in their entirety.

The means of coercion when bringing to disciplinary liability is disciplinary action.

Disciplinary action- these are measures of influence enshrined in the Administration of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, applied by commanders to a serviceman in the process of bringing him to disciplinary liability. Only direct superiors and superiors specified in the section “Imposition of disciplinary sanctions in special cases” of the Administration of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation can impose disciplinary sanctions. The disciplinary power vested in junior superiors is always vested in senior superiors. If the commander (chief), due to the gravity of the offense committed by a subordinate, considers the disciplinary power granted to him to be insufficient, he initiates a petition to impose a penalty on the perpetrator, the authority of the senior commander (chief). A commander (chief) who has exceeded the disciplinary authority granted to him bears responsibility for this. A senior commander does not have the right to cancel or reduce a disciplinary sanction imposed by a junior commander due to the severity of the penalty, unless the latter has exceeded the authority granted to him. The senior commander has the right to cancel a disciplinary sanction imposed by a junior commander if he finds that this sanction does not correspond to the gravity of the offense committed, and to impose a more severe penalty.

Conditions for applying disciplinary liability:

Disciplinary responsibility can and should be used only in the interests of service to maintain military discipline and statutory order;

Only those commanders (chiefs) who exercise disciplinary rights against violators of military discipline can be held disciplinary accountable;

disciplinary liability is implemented to the extent and within the limits determined by the charter.

For violation of military discipline or public order, a serviceman personally bears disciplinary responsibility.

For the correct and legal application of disciplinary liability, military legislation establishes an appropriate procedure for disciplinary action. The Administration of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, in particular, defines specific rules for imposing disciplinary sanctions, which boil down to the following:

a serviceman who has committed a disciplinary offense may be subject to only those disciplinary sanctions that are determined by the Administration of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, corresponding to the military rank of the perpetrator and the disciplinary authority of the commander;

When imposing a penalty, there should be no haste. The decision to prosecute is made, as a rule, within 24 hours, but no later than 10 days from the day the commander became aware of the offense committed.

A serviceman who considers himself innocent has the right to file a complaint within 10 days from the date of imposition of a disciplinary sanction. Enforcement of the imposed penalty when filing a complaint is not suspended until an order from the senior commander (chief) to cancel it follows. The decision to impose a disciplinary sanction must be preceded by a trial, which is conducted in order to identify the perpetrators, identify the causes and conditions conducive to the commission of the offense.

Analysis of disciplinary offense

1. Objective characteristics of the offense and the circumstances of its commission:

the time and duration of the acts alleged to constitute misconduct;

place of the action being studied;

those present during the offense (witnesses, victims, participants);

the essence of the probable offense: what rule was violated, what activity it relates to, what technical means and material assets were used, whether there was material or other damage, its type and amount;

when and how the offense became known;

who committed the offense; what should be done to identify those involved in the offense.

2. Preparation for a comprehensive study of the offense:

what questions should be answered;

what data about the personality of the serviceman, his condition and relationships with colleagues is advisable to have in the course of studying the offense;

who to involve to clarify the circumstances and essence of the offense;

how and at what time a diagnostic conversation should be conducted with an alleged violator of military discipline.

3. Moral and psychological characteristics of the offense: a) motives and degree of guilt:

Deliberate, willful, malicious violation of military order;

negligence (negligence, negligence, improvidence, forgetfulness);

strong emotional disturbance (fear, indignation, resentment, offended sense of honor and personal dignity, desire to avoid unpleasant experiences);

exceeding the limits of necessary defense;

ignorance of the service procedure, provided that the serviceman is obliged and could study the relevant requirements;

b) mitigating circumstances:

unclear leadership, errors in setting the task and organizing activities by the boss;

lack of control, connivance, low demands, impunity;

the presence of shortcomings in the study of statutes and legal propaganda;

poor performance in the unit, low team cohesion, lack of public opinion condemning violations of military discipline;

the presence in units of negative traditions corresponding to the content of this offense, the influence of a negative example;

c) aggravating circumstances:

this is not the first time the offense has been committed;

violation of military discipline occurred during the performance of official duties;

the offense was committed while drunk;

there was complicity in a group offense;

there are significant negative consequences of the offense.

4. Moral and psychological consequences of the offense and the reaction to it:

a) to whom and what kind of moral and psychological damage was caused by this offense, what impact did the offense have on the intra-collective status of the serviceman and his relationships with colleagues, what changes exist or are possible in connection with the offense in the system of disciplining the personnel of the unit, in the climate of the military collective;

b) the internal reaction of a serviceman to the offense he has committed: satisfaction with the achievement of the goal and the result obtained, remorse, remorse, feelings of shame, guilt and regret, excessive emotional reaction (suffering, the experience of the irreversibility of what was done, fear of punishment);

c) collective-group reaction to misconduct:

conviction of an offense by personnel;

the unit was indifferent to the offense and did not pay attention to it;

there are signs of sympathy, pity, and an increase in the intra-collective status of the serviceman;

an offense may become an example for others and provoke similar or other violations of discipline.

5. Conclusions and data for decision making:

the severity of this violation of order (minor, gross, close to an offense);

causes of misconduct, including psychological: indiscipline, socio-psychological instability, negative emotional state;

under what conditions the offense could have been prevented; Whose fault was it that he was not warned;

what shortcomings in the disciplinary system, in working with this serviceman, were revealed by the misconduct; what impact and for what specific purposes should be exerted on this soldier; what needs to be done to eliminate the negative consequences of the offense.

If during the proceedings it turns out that the serviceman’s misconduct contains elements of a crime, the unit commander notifies the military prosecutor,, if necessary, initiates a criminal case and begins an investigation.

In accordance with the requirements of Art. 49 of the DU of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, for the purpose of public condemnation of violations of military discipline or public order, misconduct of military personnel by decision of the commander (chief) may be considered and discussed:

a) soldiers and sailors - at personnel meetings;

b) sergeants and foremen - at meetings of sergeants and foremen;

c) warrant officers and midshipmen - at meetings of warrant officers and midshipmen;

d) female military personnel - at meetings of female military personnel in military ranks (positions) not lower than the military rank (position) of the female military personnel whose misconduct is being discussed;

e) officers - at officer meetings.

Bringing to disciplinary liability a soldier on duty. According to Art. 89 of the DU of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, the imposition of a disciplinary sanction on a serviceman who is part of a daily detachment (on combat duty) for offenses committed by him while on duty is carried out after a change from the detachment or after replacing him with another military personnel, but not earlier than one day later.

Bringing to disciplinary liability a serviceman who is in a state of intoxication. In accordance with Art. 90 of the DU of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, the imposition of a disciplinary sanction on a serviceman who is in a state of intoxication, as well as obtaining any explanations from him, is postponed until he sobers up,

According to Art. 91 of the DU of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, it is prohibited to impose several disciplinary sanctions for the same offense or to combine one penalty with another, to impose penalties on the entire personnel of a unit instead of punishing the direct culprits, and also to subject them to disciplinary sanctions - arrest without determining its duration. When imposing a disciplinary sanction, the commander should not humiliate the personal dignity of a subordinate or allow rudeness.

The imposition of a disciplinary sanction is announced:

soldiers and sailors - personally in front of the line;

to sergeants - in person, at a meeting or in front of a formation of sergeants;

for warrant officers - in person at a meeting of warrant officers, as well as at a meeting of warrant officers and officers;

officers - in person or at a meeting.

In addition, disciplinary sanctions may be announced in an order. It is prohibited to announce a disciplinary sanction to commanders in the presence of their subordinates.

When declaring a disciplinary sanction, the following is indicated:

the reason that led to the punishment;

what constitutes a violation of military discipline or public order.

A disciplinary sanction imposed on a serviceman is carried out, as a rule, immediately and only in exceptional cases no later than a month from the date of its imposition. After one month, the penalty is not enforced, but a record of it is kept in the service card. In the latter case, the person through whose fault the imposed penalty was not enforced bears responsibility.

Measures to suppress disciplinary violations:

a reminder to military personnel about duties and military duty (Articles 48, 83 of the RF Armed Forces, Articles 26, 75 of the Civil Code and the Constitutional Court of the RF Armed Forces);

removal from office (Article 50 of the RF Armed Forces Administration);

replacement of a serviceman who is part of a daily detachment on combat duty (Article 89 of the DU of the RF Armed Forces):

placement of a serviceman who has violated military discipline or public order and is in a state of intoxication in a guardhouse or in a temporary detention cell (Article 90 of the DU of the RF Armed Forces, Article 26 of the Criminal Code and the Constitutional Court);

termination of vacation, business trip, dismissal (Articles 26, 79 of the Civil Code and the Constitutional Court);

disciplinary detention (Articles 26, 75 of the Criminal Code and the Constitutional Court of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation);

the use of weapons as a last resort (Article 9 of the RF Armed Forces, Article 79 of the Criminal Code and the Constitutional Court of the RF Armed Forces).

Despite the fact that the choice of measures to suppress disciplinary offenses depends on many specific circumstances, the purpose of their use is general - to stop the violation of military discipline and public order, to prevent serious consequences and to restore statutory order. This differs from disciplinary sanctions, which are applied as punishment for an already committed offense.

TOPIC No. 29 “Methodology for preparing and summing up combat and state-legal training, the state of military discipline in subsection TOPIC No. 29
"METHODOLOGY OF PREPARATION AND
SUMMING UP ON COMBAT AND
STATE LEGAL
PREPARATION, CONDITION
MILITARY DISCIPLINE IN
DIVISION."

First question: Management requirements
documents on organization of summing up
results of combat and civil defense, the state of military
disciplines in the department.
Second question: Content and order
work of deputy company commander for
VSPR on organizing summing up in
division.
and I.

Summing up
results
activities
military personnel
And
military
teams
This
systematic
analysis of the achievement of set goals
and tasks in combat and state legal
preparation,
execution
accepted
obligations
By
combat
competition held by educational
and social and legal work.

Summing up the results of the battle, GPP,
state of military discipline
held:
in the department, crew, calculation daily, at the end of the day;
in a platoon - once a week, at the end
weeks;
in a company (battery) once a week.

summing up the results of the combat competition
held:
in crew, crew, department weekly:
in a platoon - 2 times a month:
V
company,
linear
battalion
monthly;
in a separate battalion, formation quarterly and during the training period.

along with showing quantitative
the results of combat and civil defense should be
fully appreciated:
- team cohesion;
- comradely mutual assistance;
participation of soldiers in public work.

the winners of the combat competition must
encourage and reward:
- soldiers, cadets, sergeants, military personnel
under contract, officers - in accordance with
provisions of the Disciplinary Charter;
- crews, crews, squads, platoons and them
equal
divisions
passing
pennants of the battalion (division) based on the results
months;
companies
And
them
equal
divisions
challenge prizes and military certificates
parts - based on the results of the training period and educational
of the year.

At
summing up
results
combat
competitions in combat and state legal
preparation
deputy
The company commander according to ViSPR is obliged to:
recall the tasks that were set
for a given month.

Analyze the implementation of these tasks according to
sections.
A)
Combat
And
state-legal
Preparation:
- what topics were worked on last year?
month;
- what results were achieved;
- which of the military personnel, squads, platoons
achieved better results, (reason);
- which of the military personnel, platoon sections did not
fulfilled their obligations (reason).

B)
State
military
disciplines
By
compared to the previous month:
- give a general assessment of the state of the military
disciplines
By
comparison
With
previous
month;
- show the best squads, platoons and soldiers,
methods of work of platoon commanders who have achieved
positive results;
- disclose the number and nature of violations
military discipline, who and under what conditions
committed, call undisciplined warriors
and show what harm they brought to the military cause
readiness for their violations;
- determine platoon locations based on condition
military discipline.

B) The state of guard duty and internal
services:
- note how the platoon soldiers served in
guard duty and daily duty;
- show the best warriors serving
vigilantly and without comment;
- show the soldiers who negligently performed
their duties on guard (daily duty),
reveal the main reasons for their actions;
- determine the locations of squads, platoons by
performing guard duty and daily duty.

D) The state of internal order in the company:
- show the attitude of military personnel towards
maintaining internal order;
- mark the best warriors who distinguished themselves during
establishing and maintaining internal order;
- mark the worst warriors who are negligent
to maintaining internal order and basic
the reasons for this situation;
- determine the locations of maintenance departments
internal order.

D) The state of educational work in the company:
- what educational activities were
carried out over the past week, month;
- which military personnel showed activity and
diligence in their implementation;
- evaluate the performance of company assets.

E) Final part:
- determine the locations of platoons and squads behind
last week, month;
- recognize and reward the best warriors;
- set tasks for the next week,
month.

The report must:

2. Based on the criteria for assessing discipline in the unit, give an assessment to each platoon and section (crew, crew).

Note the characteristic shortcomings of each of these divisions:

In combat duty, guard and internal services;

In relation to personnel to equipment and weapons, their study, development and conservation;

Internally, following the daily routine;

In compliance with the statutory rules of relations between military personnel;

In fulfilling the class schedule;

According to other parameters.

At the end of summing up, those who distinguished themselves should be encouraged and those who were guilty should be noted for the worse.

After defining specific tasks, the commander begins to assess the personal discipline of the sergeants (foremen) and their work to strengthen military discipline and law and order.

At the same time, he analyzes:

1) the level of executive discipline among sergeants (foremen), timeliness and quality of executed orders and instructions of senior commanders;

2) personal exemplary character of the sergeants (seniors) in fulfilling the requirements of the regulations and their functional duties;

3) cases of biased reports or concealment of facts of violation of military discipline among subordinates;

4) the role of sergeants (foremen) in maintaining the statutory order in the unit, observing the uniform and daily routine;

5) participation of sergeants (foremen) in disciplinary practice, their compliance with the law and statutory requirements in relations with subordinates;

6) the work of sergeants (foremen) in instilling in their subordinates a love of service, satisfying their needs and requests, training and education.

Company commanders (their equals) must have a special notebook with materials for analyzing and summing up military discipline.

It is impossible to analyze and evaluate the state of military discipline in subordinate units by the number of disciplinary sanctions imposed on military personnel . This undermines the authority of demanding, strong-willed commanders.

3.6. Basic forms and methods
studying individual psychological
characteristics of military personnel

End of work -

This topic belongs to the section:

Fundamentals of military pedagogy and psychology

State educational institution.. of higher professional education Omsk State Technical University..

If you need additional material on this topic, or you did not find what you were looking for, we recommend using the search in our database of works:

What will we do with the received material:

If this material was useful to you, you can save it to your page on social networks:

All topics in this section:

Publishing house Omsk State Technical University
UDC 355:37:159 BBK 68.43+88.4 O–75 Reviewers: V.I. Golikov, Ph.D. history Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Military Institute

Principles, methods and forms of military training
The most important part of the theory of military training is the principles of training.

The principles of teaching are usually understood as guiding pedagogical provisions that reflect the
Directions of the military school after the death of Peter I

After the death of Peter I (1725), the Russian army lost a firm and wise leader who knew how to prepare the army for a victorious war through very simple and rational decisions. Subsequently, the army
Followers of Suvorov

Rice. 1.5. Field Marshal General Mikhail Illarionovich Kutuzov (1745–1813) Advanced ideas for training and education of Russian soldiers were adopted
Military pedagogical views of M.I. Dragomirova

Rice. 1.7. Adjutant General Mikhail Ivanovich Dragomirov (1830–1905) With the name M.I. Dragomirov is associated with the creation in Russia holistically
The importance of the military-pedagogical heritage of Russian commanders for the activities of officer cadres in modern conditions

Military historical works of scientists, generals, military leaders, and journalistic materials are important for the acquisition of professional knowledge. Among the officers they perceived with interest
Forms and methods of organizing and conducting combat training classes

Organization and conduct of combat training classes
The practice of combat training shows that the quality and methodological level of training, the effectiveness of training personnel depend on the leader’s ability to properly prepare for his task.

Features of moral and psychological support in various types of combat operations
The main features of modern combat, along with maneuverability, tension and dynamism, are rapid and sudden changes in the situation, the widespread use of various means of armed struggle

Types of psychological preparation
Psychological training of military personnel is carried out during training and service. All types of training - fire, tactical, physical, combat, special, the entire training process must be

Ways to organize psychological training
The methods of psychological training are based on the principle of introducing into the process of combat training elements of tension and surprise, danger and risk inherent in a real combat situation, and

Ensuring the safety of military service
Security of military service is a state of military service that ensures the protection of military personnel, the local population and the environment from threats arising during the implementation of active

Basics of organizing educational work
The organization of educational work begins with studying its state at all levels at a specific point in time and involves clarifying the state of such parameters as: the availability and quality of plans

Organization and methodology of public and state training
The main documents defining the organization and conduct of public and state training in the Armed Forces are the order of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation of 1993 No. 250 “On the organization of public and state training

Organization and methodology of informing
From the unit's officers' knowledge of the spiritual and information needs of personnel and the ability to purposefully and creatively apply in practice a wide range of traditional and new methods of information

Organization of work to strengthen law and order and military discipline
The decisive role in maintaining law and order and military discipline in the unit belongs to the commander. Together with him and other officers of the unit, the tasks of maintaining law and order and strengthening the military

Basics of psychological work
Psychological work is a system of coordinated, purposeful activities carried out using the achievements of psychological science in the interests of the life of troops (forces), according to

Studying the psychological characteristics of a serviceman
The study of subordinates is achieved, as a rule, in two interrelated ways.

The first is a special study, collection and analysis of various data about life, study, service and behavior
Studying the psychological characteristics of the military collective

If the commander knows the characteristics of the team he leads, then he will easily be able to find the most effective methods of management, he will be able to implement the decisions made with great success.
Organization of leisure activities for personnel on pre-weekends and weekends (holidays)

The basis for organizing meaningful leisure for personnel is a well-thought-out plan of cultural and leisure activities, which is drawn up in advance.
For this purpose, usually on Thursday, commander

Having a relaxing evening
As a rule, the unit spends its evening of relaxation in the military unit’s club, cafe, soldiers’ tea room, and sometimes in the military headquarters. Relaxation evenings can be held in various forms: evenings of song, music, etc.

Organization of amateur performances
You should start with the selection of participants. For this purpose, during individual conversations, warriors with the abilities and skills of playing musical instruments and singing, recitation and choreography are identified

Conducting cultural trips and excursions Among the various forms of cultural and leisure work used in military units, cultural outings occupy an important place. They enrich soldiers with knowledge on various issues of politics and science

Gypsies map. Card fortune telling

Numerology will accurately determine your compatibility by date of birth

2024-06-21 00:00:19

Shortbread cookies with mayonnaise

Cookies with mayonnaise are by no means a dietary dessert, however, this time we are writing an article...

2024-06-21 00:00:19

Broken glass cake with sour cream recipe

I like “Broken Glass” for its spectacular look. If you use ready-made biscuits for it...

2024-06-20 00:00:18

In what year was Rurik invited to reign?

On December 29, the Russian film “Viking” will be released on cinema screens, telling the story of the coming...

2024-06-20 00:00:18

Prayer by Agreement, Christian Love and a Saved Child

People agree to pray about something together: at the same time they get up to pray, although...

2024-06-20 00:00:18