Classification of naval artillery. Weapon caliber Limitation of naval weapons
It is very difficult to talk about artillery today. To put it simply, there is Shirokorad, and those who are interested in artillery issues are well aware of the names of other Russian and foreign artillery historians. This is in particulars. Reviews are easier to do, and such articles are good precisely because they push readers to independently search for material and come to their own conclusions. Ultimately, to form your own view on the topic of the article.
But it so happened that several readers immediately raised a rather interesting question about heavy guns in the Russian army before and during the First World War.
How could it be that Russia “missed” the increasing importance of heavy weapons at the beginning of the 20th century? And how did it happen that Soviet Russia was among the world leaders in the production of such weapons before World War II?
We will try to answer both of these questions, especially since the answers contain several interesting points.
In fact, everything was very, very natural!
To understand what Russian artillery was, it is necessary to clearly understand the structure of artillery units and subunits. In 1910, the organization of Russian artillery was adopted. So, artillery division:
- Field, designed to support combat operations of ground (field) forces. It included light and horse, mountain and horse-mountain, howitzer and field heavy.
- Serf, designed for the defense of fortresses (land and coastal), ports and roadsteads.
- Siege, designed to destroy fortress walls, destroy enemy fortifications and ensure the advance of ground forces.
As you can see, the presence of heavy weapons seems to be mandatory. Even in the field guns category.
But why then did we face the war practically unarmed in this sense? Agree, a 122-mm field howitzer of the 1909 model (firing range up to 7,700 m), a 152-mm field howitzer of the 1910 model and a 152-mm siege gun of the 1910 model are not enough for the army of a country like Russia. Moreover, if we follow the “letter of the law”, of the three guns with a caliber greater than 120 mm, only the 152 mm can be “legally” classified as heavy artillery.
152 mm siege gun
The generals of the General Staff should be considered to blame for the fact that heavy artillery disappeared from the Russian army at the beginning of the century. It was the General Staff that actively developed the idea of fast, maneuverable war. But this is not a Russian invention. This is a French doctrine of war, for which the presence of a large number of heavy guns is not necessary. And even harmful because of the difficulties when maneuvering and changing positions.
It is worth recalling that France at the beginning of the 20th century was a trendsetter in military fashion, and the Russian Empire was allied with France. So everything is natural.
It was this concept, as well as the obvious lag of Russian heavy artillery from modern models in other armies of the world, that led to the fact that the siege artillery that existed at that time was disbanded.
The guns of the first half of the 19th century were sent to a warehouse or to a fortress. It was believed that 152 mm guns would be sufficient for a new war. Larger calibers were disposed of or sent for storage.
Instead of siege artillery there should have been units of heavy army artillery. But... There were no modern weapons for these formations!
At the beginning of the war (August 1, 1914), the Russian army had 7,088 guns. Of these, howitzers - 512 pieces. In addition to the heavy guns already listed, there were other developments.
152 mm siege weapon (mentioned above) - 1 piece.
203 mm howitzer mod. 1913 - 1 piece.
We will see an even more depressing picture if we look at the documents on the production of ammunition. The 107 mm cannon and 152 mm howitzers fired 1,000 rounds per gun. 48% of the required volume. But on the other hand, the plan for the production of shells for 76-mm guns was exceeded by more than 2 times.
We cannot ignore the organization of the Russian ground forces. Precisely from the point of view of artillery.
The infantry division included an artillery brigade consisting of two divisions, each of which consisted of 3 batteries of 76 mm light guns. 48 guns in the brigade. Artillery commanders, the main organizers of artillery action in battle, were not provided for in the states at all. The army corps (two infantry divisions) had a division of 122 mm light howitzers (12 guns).
Through simple mathematical operations we obtain terrible figures for the provision of artillery pieces to the Russian army. The army corps had only 108 guns! Of these, 12 are howitzers. And not a single heavy one!
Even a simple mathematical calculation of the striking power of the army corps shows that in reality this formation did not have the necessary not only defensive, but also offensive force. And another major miscalculation of our generals immediately came to light. 12 howitzers per hull indicates an underestimation of guns for overhead fire. There are light howitzers, but there were no mortars at all!
So, the transition to trench warfare showed the shortcomings of the Russian army. The guns for flat fire could not ensure the suppression of enemy infantry and fire weapons in the presence of a developed positional system. The deeply layered defense provided excellent defense against cannons.
The understanding has come that mortars and howitzers are simply vital. Moreover, guns require increased power. The enemy not only uses natural obstacles, but also builds serious engineering structures.
So, on the second line of defense, the Germans built dugouts up to 15(!) meters deep to shelter the infantry! Guns or light howitzers are simply powerless here. But heavy howitzers or mortars will do the job quite well.
203 mm howitzer model 1913
Here comes the answer to one important question even today. A universal weapon! When we wrote about universal tools, we believed in the necessity of such tools. But! Not a single “generalist” can surpass a “narrow specialist”. This means that all types of artillery are needed.
The command of the Russian army quickly learned the lessons of the first months of the war. In 1915-16, based on combat experience, several artillery systems were developed in Russia - a 203-mm howitzer of the 1915 model, a 280-mm mortar of the 1914-1915 model, and a 305-mm howitzer of the 1916 model. True, very few of them were released.
By January 1917, the General Staff of the Russian Army created the Special Purpose Heavy Artillery (TAON), or "48th Corps". TAON consisted of 6 brigades with 388 guns, the most powerful of which were new 120 mm long-range guns, 152 mm Kane coastal guns, 245 mm coastal guns, 152 and 203 mm. howitzers and new 305-mm howitzers from the Obukhov plant of the 1915 model, 280-mm mortars.
305 mm howitzer model 1915
The First World War showed commanders and military engineers the necessary and sufficient ratio of artillery, guns and howitzers (mortars). In 1917, there were 4 howitzers for 5 guns! For comparison, at the beginning of the war the numbers were different. One howitzer for two guns.
But in general, if we talk specifically about heavy artillery, at the end of the war the Russian army had 1,430 heavy guns. For comparison: the Germans had 7862 guns. Even fighting on two fronts, the figure is indicative.
It was this war that made artillery the most important factor in any victory. God of war! And she pushed Soviet engineers to actively work on the design and creation of truly “divine” weapons.
Understanding the importance of heavy artillery and the possibility of creating it are really different things. But in the new country this was well understood. We had to do exactly the same with tanks and airplanes - if you can’t create it yourself, copy it.
It was easier with guns. There were Russian (quite good) models, and there were a huge number of imported systems. Fortunately, they captured a lot of them, both by capturing them on the fields of the First World War and during the intervention, and also due to the fact that yesterday’s Entente allies actively supplied Yudenich, Kolchak, Denikin and others with military equipment.
There were also officially purchased guns, such as this 114-mm howitzer from Vickers. We will talk about it separately, as well as about all guns with a caliber of 120 mm and above.
114.3 mm rapid-fire howitzer "Vickers" model 1910
In addition, the Red Army received howitzers located on opposite sides of the front: Krupp and Schneider. The production of the Krupp model was undertaken by the Putilov plant, and the production of the Schneider model by the Motovilikha and Obukhov plants. And these two guns became the support base for all further development of heavy artillery.
122 mm howitzer model 1909
152 mm howitzer model 1910
In the Soviet Union they understood: you can’t live without bread, and you can’t live without guns either. Therefore, having finished with economic issues, it was Stalin who took up defense. The year 1930 can be called the starting point, because it was in this year that huge changes began in the army and navy.
This also affected artillery. The “old ladies” howitzers were modernized. But that was just the beginning. English, German and French women became participants in experiments by Soviet gunsmiths, the goal of which was to obtain suitable and modern artillery systems. And, I must say, success often accompanied our engineers.
We will describe in detail and in color the history of the creation and service of almost all of our large-caliber guns. The history of the creation of each is a separate detective story, since the authors did not even imagine this at all. A sort of “Rubik’s Cube” from artillery developers. But it’s interesting.
Meanwhile, while the design bureau was working on designing new guns, the structure of the Red Army artillery underwent very noticeable changes.
A paradox, perhaps, but for the better. Back in 1922, military reform in the army began, which by 1930 gave its first fruits and results.
The author and implementer of the reform was M.V. Frunze, a man who could become not only an outstanding commander, but also a practitioner of army building. Alas, his early death did not allow this to be done. The work on reforming the Red Army, begun by Frunze, was completed by K. E. Voroshilov.
M. V. Frunze
K. E. Voroshilov
We have already talked about the “polkovushka”, a 76-mm regimental gun that appeared in 1927. An epoch-making weapon, and not only with outstanding performance characteristics. Yes, the cannon fired at 6.7 km, despite the fact that it weighed only 740 kg. The light weight made the gun very mobile, which was beneficial and gave the artillerymen the opportunity to closely interact with units of the rifle regiment.
By the way, at the same time, in the armies of other countries there was no regimental artillery at all, and support issues were resolved by separating infantry support guns from the divisional artillery. So in this matter, the Red Army specialists wiped the nose of Europe. And the Great Patriotic War only confirmed the correctness of the way of organizing regimental artillery.
In 1923, such a unit as the rifle corps was created. The task of introducing corps artillery into the Red Army was simultaneously solved. Each rifle corps received, in addition to regimental artillery, a heavy artillery division armed with 107 mm cannons and 152 mm howitzers. Subsequently, the corps artillery was reorganized into heavy artillery regiments.
In 1924, divisional artillery received a new organization. At the beginning, an artillery regiment of two divisions was introduced into the rifle division, as in the Russian army, then the number of divisions in the regiment was increased to three. With the same three batteries in the division. The armament of the divisional artillery consisted of 76-mm cannons of the 1902 model and 122-mm howitzers of the 1910 model. The number of guns increased to 54 units of 76-mm cannons and 18 units of howitzers.
The organizational structure of the artillery of the Red Army at the beginning of the Great Patriotic War will be considered separately, since this is a rather serious study, especially in comparison with the artillery of the Wehrmacht.
In general, today it is customary to talk about the lag of the Red Army behind the armies of European countries in the 30s of the last century. This is true for some branches of the military, but artillery is definitely not included in the sad list. If you look closely at large-caliber artillery, field artillery, anti-tank artillery, anti-aircraft artillery, many nuances will be revealed here, indicating that the artillery of the Red Army was not just at a certain height, but at least not inferior to the leading armies of the world. And in many ways it was superior.
Further materials on this topic will be devoted to proving this statement. The Red Army had a god of war.
We decided to start this article in a non-traditional way. Simply because they considered it appropriate to talk about one of the little-known episodes of the war on the Karelian Isthmus. Due, probably, to the absence of more or less turning-point battles in this area, we generally talk little about the Karelian Front. So, a story about the work of Captain Ivan Vedemenko, in the future - Hero of the Soviet Union.
Captain Vedemenko commanded the Karelian Sculptors battery. It was this name that the 203-mm special-power howitzers B-4 received during the Soviet-Finnish war. They deserved it. These howitzers perfectly “dismantled for parts” Finnish bunkers. What remained after shelling the bunkers with heavy shells looked truly bizarre. Pieces of concrete with reinforcement sticking out in all directions. So, the howitzer’s soldier’s name is well deserved and honorable.
But we will talk about another time. About June 1944. It was at this time that our army began an offensive on the Karelian Isthmus. During the offensive, the assault group reached the impregnable Finnish bunker "Millionaire". Unapproachable in the literal sense of the word. The thickness of the walls of the bunker was such that it was impossible to destroy it even with heavy aviation bombs - 2 meters of reinforced concrete!
The walls of the bunker went 3 floors into the ground. The top of the bunker, in addition to reinforced concrete, was protected by an armored dome. The flanks were covered by smaller bunkers. A bunker was built as the main defense center of the area.
The battery of Captain Vedemenko came to the aid of the assault group of Nikolai Bogaev (group commander). Two B-4 howitzers were placed 12 km from the bunker in closed positions.
The commanders located their OP at a short distance from the bunker. Almost on a minefield (the bunker was surrounded by several rows of minefields and wire fences). Morning has come. Battalion commander Vedemenko began shooting.
The first shell tore off the embankment of the bunker, exposing a concrete wall. The second shell ricocheted off the wall. The third one ended up in the corner of the bunker. This was enough for the battalion commander to make the necessary adjustments and begin shelling the structure. By the way, it is worth noting one circumstance.
The proximity of the OP not only made it possible for the battery commander to adjust each shot, but also provided an “unforgettable experience” for everyone who was at the OP. Shells weighing 100 kg, with a corresponding roar, flew towards the bunker at a low altitude above our commanders and soldiers.
Let’s just say that the participants in the events could understand from their own experience what “direct support of heavy artillery” means.
It was only possible to break through the wall on about the 30th shell. Through binoculars, reinforcement bars became visible. A total of 140 shells were used, of which 136 hit the target. “Karelian sculptors” created their next work, and “Millionaire” actually turned into an architectural monument.
And now we move directly to the “architects” and “sculptors”, the B-4 special power howitzers.
The story about these unique weapons should start from afar. In November 1920, under the Artillery Committee, which was headed by the former lieutenant general of the tsarist army Robert Avgustovich Durlyakher, also known as Rostislav Avgustovich Durlyakhov, an Artillery Design Bureau was created under the leadership of Franz Frantsevich Linder. We have already talked about this man in one of the previous articles.
In accordance with the decision of the Revolutionary Military Council of the USSR to re-equip high-power and special-power artillery with new domestic material, Linder Design Bureau on December 11, 1926 received the task to develop a project for a 203-mm long-reach howitzer within a 46-month period. Naturally, the project was headed by the head of the design bureau.
However, on September 14, 1927, F. F. Linder died. The project was transferred to the Bolshevik plant (formerly the Obukhov plant). A. G. Gavrilov was entrusted with managing the project.
The design of the howitzer was completed on January 16, 1928. Moreover, the designers presented two projects at once. The gun bodies and ballistics were the same in both versions. The difference was the presence of a muzzle brake. When discussing options, preference was given to a howitzer without a muzzle brake.
The reason for this choice, as with the choice of other high-power weapons, was the unmasking factor. The muzzle brake created a column of dust visible for kilometers. The enemy could easily detect the battery with the help of aircraft and even visual observation.
The first prototype of the B-4 howitzer was manufactured at the beginning of 1931. It was this gun that was used at NIAP in July-August 1931 during firing to select charges for the B-4.
After lengthy field and military tests in 1933, the howitzer was adopted by the Red Army under the designation “203-mm howitzer model 1931.” The howitzer was intended to destroy particularly strong concrete, reinforced concrete and armored structures, to combat large-caliber enemy artillery or covered with strong structures, and to suppress distant targets.
A special feature of the howitzer is its carriage with caterpillar tracks. The successful design of this carriage, which provided the howitzer with sufficiently high maneuverability and allowed firing from the ground without the use of special platforms, became unified for a whole family of high-power guns. The use of this unified carriage also made it possible to speed up the development and introduction into production of new high-power guns.
The upper carriage of the B-4 howitzer was a riveted steel structure. Using a pin socket, the upper machine was put on the combat pin of the lower machine and turned on it when the rotating mechanism was used. The firing sector provided in this case was small and amounted to only ±4°.
To aim the gun at a larger angle in the horizontal plane, it was necessary to turn the entire gun in the appropriate direction. The lifting mechanism had one gear sector. attached to the cradle. With its help, the gun could be aimed in a vertical plane in the angle range from 0° to +60°. To quickly bring the barrel to the loading angle, the gun had a special mechanism.
The anti-recoil system included a hydraulic recoil brake and a hydropneumatic knurler. All recoil devices remained motionless during the roll-up. The stability of the gun when firing was also ensured by a coulter attached to the trunk part of the lower machine. In the frontal part of the lower machine, cast shoes were fixed into which the combat axle was inserted. Caterpillars were put on the cone of the combat axis.
B-4 howitzers had two types of barrels: fastened without a liner and with a liner, as well as monoblock barrels with a liner. The liner could be replaced in the field. Regardless of the type of barrel, its length was 25 calibers, the length of the rifled part was 19.6 calibers. 64 grooves of constant steepness were made in the barrel bore. The bolt was a piston type, and both two-stroke and three-stroke bolts were used. The weight of the barrel with the bolt was 5200 kg.
The howitzer could fire a variety of high-explosive and concrete-piercing shells, including shells supplied from Great Britain to Russia during the First World War. The use of full and 11 variable charges was envisaged. At the same time, the mass of the full charge was 15.0-15.5 kg of gunpowder, and the 11th - 3.24 kg.
When fired with a full charge, the F-625D, G-620 and G-620Sh projectiles had an initial speed of 607 m/s and ensured the destruction of targets located at a distance of up to 17,890 m. Thanks to the large elevation angle (up to 60°) and variable charges, giving 12 different initial projectile velocities provided the ability to choose optimal trajectories for hitting a variety of targets. Loading was carried out using a manually operated crane. The rate of fire was 1 shot per 2 minutes.
For transportation, the howitzer was disassembled into two parts: the barrel, removed from the carriage and placed on a special cart, and the tracked carriage connected to the front - the carriage. The howitzer could also be transported unassembled over short distances. (This method of transportation was sometimes used during combat operations to deploy howitzers for direct fire on enemy reinforced concrete defenses.)
For transportation, tracked tractors of the Kommunar type were used; the maximum permissible speed on the highway was 15 km/h. At the same time, the caterpillar drive made it possible to increase the off-road maneuverability of the guns. Sufficiently heavy guns easily crossed even swampy areas.
By the way, the successful carriage design was also used for other artillery systems. In particular, for intermediate samples of the 152-mm Br-19 gun and for the 280-mm Br-5 mortar.
Naturally, the question arises about the differences in howitzer design. Why and how did they appear? The difference in the design of specific guns was obvious. At the same time, these were B-4 howitzers.
In our opinion, there were two reasons. The first and main thing is the small production capacity of Soviet factories and the lack of ability to implement projects. Simply put, the equipment of the factories did not allow them to produce the required products. And the second reason is the presence directly in production of a whole galaxy of outstanding designers who could adapt projects to the capabilities of a particular plant.
In the case of B-4, this is exactly what happened. Serial production of howitzers began at the Bolshevik plant in 1932. At the same time, the task was set to start production at the Barrikady plant. Both factories could not mass-produce howitzers according to the project. Local designers finalized the designs to suit production capabilities.
"Bolshevik" presented the first production howitzer for delivery in 1933. But I couldn’t submit it to the state commission until the end of the year. "Barricades" fired two howitzers in the first half of 1934. Then the plant, using its last strength, was able to produce 15 more guns (1934). Production was stopped. The only manufacturer was Bolshevik.
The designers of the Bolshevik modified the howitzer. The new version has a longer barrel with improved ballistics. The new gun received a new index - B-4 BM (high power). The guns produced before the modernization began to be called B-4 MM (low power). The difference between BM and MM was 3 calibers (609 mm).
If you carefully examine the B-4 of these two factories, you get the strong impression that these are two different weapons. Perhaps our opinion is controversial, but different howitzers entered service with the Red Army under the same designation. However, for soldiers and officers of artillery units this was not particularly important. The guns were identical in most respects.
But “Bolshevik” could not boast of success in the production of the B-4. In 1937, howitzers began to be assembled at the Barricades again. Moreover, another plant was involved in production - Novokramatorsky. Thus, by the beginning of the Great Patriotic War, the production of howitzers was launched at three factories. And the total number of guns that entered the artillery units was 849 pieces (of both modifications).
The B-4 howitzer received its baptism of fire on the Soviet-Finnish front during the Winter War with Finland. On March 1, 1940, there were 142 B-4 howitzers there. At the beginning of the article we mentioned the soldier's name for this weapon. "Karelian sculptor". There were 4 howitzers lost or disabled during this war. The figure is more than worthy.
B-4 howitzers were only in the high-power howitzer artillery regiments of the RVGK. According to the regiment's staff (as of February 19, 1941), it had four divisions of three batteries. Each battery consisted of 2 howitzers. One howitzer was considered a platoon. In total, the regiment had 24 howitzers, 112 tractors, and 242 cars. 12 motorcycles and 2304 personnel (including 174 officers). By June 22, 1941, the RVGK had 33 regiments with B-4 howitzers. That is, there are only 792 howitzers in the state.
The Great Patriotic B-4 actually began only in 1942. Although, in fairness, it should be noted that in 1941 we lost 75 howitzers. Of those that could not be sent to the eastern regions.
At the beginning of the war, several B-4 howitzers were captured by the Germans. Thus, in the city of Dubno, the 529th high-power howitzer artillery regiment was captured by the Germans. Due to the lack of tractors, our troops abandoned 27 203-mm B-4 howitzers in good condition. The captured howitzers received the German designation 20.3 cm HaubiUe 503 (g). They were in service with several heavy artillery divisions of the Wehrmacht RKG.
Most of the guns were destroyed during the war, but according to German sources, even in 1944, 8 more of these guns were operating on the eastern front.
The losses of B-4 howitzers in 1941 were compensated for by increased production. The factories produced 105 guns! However, their delivery to the front was suspended due to the impossibility of using them during the retreat. The Red Army was accumulating strength.
By May 1, 1945, 30 brigades and 4 separate high-power artillery regiments of the RVGK had 760 203-mm howitzers of the 1932 model.
Performance characteristics of the heavy 203-mm howitzer model 1931 B-4:
Caliber – 203 mm;
Total length – 5087 mm;
Weight – 17700 kg (in combat-ready position);
Vertical guidance angle – from 0° to +60°;
Horizontal guidance angle – 8°;
Initial projectile speed – 557 (607) m/s;
Maximum firing range – 18025 m;
Projectile weight – 100 kg;
Ammunition - 8 shots;
Calculation - 15 people.
Trays on the carriage for shells
On the eve of the celebration of the 75th anniversary of our victory at Kursk, I would like to tell you another combat episode from the combat biography of the legendary howitzer. In the area of Ponyri station, scouts discovered a German Ferdinand self-propelled gun. The commander decided to destroy the Germans with his own artillery.
However, the power of the guns was not enough to guarantee destruction even in the event of a hit. B-4 came to the rescue. The well-prepared howitzer crew skillfully aimed the gun and with one shot, actually hitting the Ferdinand's wheelhouse with a shell, smashed the enemy's vehicle to pieces.
By the way, this battle is considered one of the most original ways of using howitzers in war to this day. In war, a lot of original things happen. The main thing is the effectiveness of such originality. 100 kilograms of originality on the head of German self-propelled guns...
And one more episode. From the Battle of Berlin. B-4s took part in street battles! Probably the most epic footage of the capture of Berlin was filmed with their participation. 38 guns on the streets of Berlin!
One of the guns was installed 100 meters from the enemy at the intersection of Linden Strasse and Ritter Strasse. The infantry could not advance. The Germans prepared the house for defense. The guns could not destroy machine gun nests and artillery firing positions. Our losses were great. It was necessary to take risks. Artillerymen take risks.
The B-4 crew, in fact direct fire, destroyed the house with 6 shots. Accordingly, together with the German garrison. Turning the gun, the battery commander simultaneously destroyed three more stone buildings prepared for defense. Thus providing the infantry with the opportunity to advance.
By the way, an interesting fact that we once wrote about. In Berlin there was only one building that withstood the blows of the B-4. This is the famous air defense tower in the Flakturm am Zoo area. Our howitzers were only able to destroy the corner of the tower. The garrison actually defended itself until the announcement of capitulation.
After the end of the war, the howitzer was removed from service. Alas, the advantage of the caterpillar track played a disservice in peacetime.
But that's not the end of the story. Just an episode. The weapon was put into service again! But now the designers were given the task of modernizing it. It was necessary to increase the speed of transportation of the gun.
In 1954, such modernization was carried out at the Barrikady plant. The B-4 howitzer became wheeled. The wheel travel significantly increased the towing speed of the gun, overall maneuverability, and reduced the time of transfer from the traveling position to the combat position due to the elimination of separate transportation of the carriage and barrel. The gun received a new name - B-4M.
There was no serial production of this weapon. In fact, existing howitzers were being modernized. We were unable to find out the exact number of such weapons.
But the fact that in 1964 a nuclear weapon was created specifically for the B-4 speaks volumes. Be that as it may, the B-4s were in service until the early 80s. Almost half a century of service!
Agree, this is an indicator of the value of the weapon. A gun that rightfully takes its place among the best examples of artillery engineering and design.
Caliber of rifled small arms
The most popular pistol calibers:
577 (14.7 mm) - the largest of the serial ones, the Eley revolver (Great Britain);
45 (11.4 mm) - the "national" caliber of the United States, most common in the Wild West. In 1911, the Colt M1911 automatic pistol of this caliber entered service with the Army and Navy and, having been modernized several times, served until 1985, when the US Armed Forces switched to 9mm for the Beretta_92.
38; .357 (9mm) - is currently considered optimal for handguns (less - the bullet is too “weak”, more - the gun is too heavy).
25 (6.35 mm) - TOZ-8.
2.7 mm - the smallest of the serial ones, had a “Hummingbird” pistol of the Pieper system (Belgium).
Caliber of smoothbore hunting weapons
For smoothbore hunting rifles, calibers are measured differently: caliber number means number of bullets, which can be cast from 1 English pound of lead (453.6 g). The bullets must be spherical, identical in mass and diameter, which is equal to the internal diameter of the barrel in its middle part. The smaller the barrel diameter, the greater the number of bullets. Thus twenty gauge is less than sixteen, A sixteenth less than twelfth.
Caliber designation | Designation option | Barrel diameter, mm | Varieties |
---|---|---|---|
36 | .410 | 10.4 | - |
32 | .50 | 12.5 | - |
28 | - | 13.8 | - |
24 | - | 14.7 | - |
20 | - | 15.6 (15.5 magnum) | - |
16 | - | 16.8 | - |
12 | - | 18.5 (18.2 magnum) | - |
10 | - | 19.7 | - |
4 | - | 26.5 | - |
In the designation of cartridges for smooth-bore weapons, as in the designation of cartridges for rifled weapons, it is customary to indicate the length of the sleeve, for example: 12/70 - a 12-gauge cartridge with a sleeve 70 mm long. The most common case lengths: 65, 70, 76 (magnum). Along with them there are: 60 and 89 (super magnum). The most common hunting rifles in Russia are 12 gauge. There are (in descending order of prevalence) 16, 20, 36 (.410), 32, 28, and the spread of caliber 36 (.410) is due solely to the release of Saiga carbines of the corresponding caliber.
The actual bore diameter of a given caliber in each country may differ from those indicated within certain limits. In addition, we should not forget that the barrel of a shotgun weapon usually has various types of constrictions (chokes), through which not any bullet of its caliber can pass through without damaging the barrel, so in many cases bullets are made according to the diameter of the choke and are equipped with easily cut sealing bands , which are cut down when passing the choke. It should be noted that the common caliber of signal pistols - 26.5 mm - is nothing more than the 4th hunting caliber.
Caliber of Russian artillery, aerial bombs, torpedoes and rockets
In Europe the term artillery caliber appeared in 1546, when Hartmann of Nuremberg developed a device called the Hartmann scale. It was a prismatic tetrahedral ruler. On one side the units of measurement (inches) were marked, on the other three the actual dimensions, depending on the weight in pounds, of the iron, lead and stone cores respectively.
Example(approximately):
1 face - mark lead kernels weighing 1 lb - corresponds to 1.5 inches
2nd face - iron cores 1 lb. - from 2.5
3rd side - stone kernels 1 lb. - from 3
Thus, knowing either the size or weight of the projectile, it was possible to easily assemble, and most importantly, manufacture ammunition. A similar system existed in the world for about 300 years.
In Russia before Peter 1, no standards existed. At the beginning of the 18th century, on the instructions of Peter the Great, Feldzeichmeister General Count Bruce developed a domestic caliber system based on the Hartmann scale. She divided the tools according to artillery weight projectile (cast iron core). The unit of measurement was the artillery pound - a cast iron ball with a diameter of 2 inches and a weight of 115 spools (about 490 grams). A scale was also created that correlated artillery weight with the diameter of the bore, that is, with what we now call caliber. It did not matter what types of projectiles the gun fired - buckshot, bombs or anything else. Only the theoretical artillery weight that a gun could fire given its size was taken into account. This system was introduced by royal decree in the city and lasted for a century and a half.
Example:
3-pounder gun, 3-pounder gun- official name;
artillery weight 3 pounds- the main characteristics of the weapon.
scale size 2.8 inches- bore diameter, an auxiliary characteristic of the gun.
In practice, it was a small cannon that fired cannonballs weighing about 1.5 kg and had a caliber (in our understanding) of about 70 mm.
D. E. Kozlovsky in his book translates Russian artillery weights into metric calibers:
3 lbs - 76 mm.
Explosive shells (bombs) occupied a special place in this system. Their weight was measured in pounds (1 pood = 40 trade pounds = approx. 16.3 kg). This is due to the fact that the bombs were hollow, with explosives inside, that is, made of materials of different densities. During their production, it was much more convenient to operate with generally accepted weight units.
D. Kozlovsky gives the following. ratios:
1/4 pood - 120 mm
A special weapon was intended for bombs - a bombard, or mortar. Its tactical and technical characteristics, combat missions and calibration system allow us to speak of a special type of artillery. In practice, small bombards often fired ordinary cannonballs, and then the same gun had different calibers- general at 12 pounds and special at 10 pounds.
The introduction of calibers, among other things, became a good material incentive for soldiers and officers. Thus, in the “Book of Marine Charter”, printed in St. Petersburg in 1720, in the chapter “On rewarding” the amounts of reward payments for guns taken from the enemy are given:
30 pound - 300 rubles
In the second half of the 19th century, with the introduction of rifled artillery, the scale was adjusted due to changes in the characteristics of the projectile, but the principle remained the same.
Interesting fact: in our time, artillery pieces calibrated by weight are still in service. This is due to the fact that in Great Britain a similar system was maintained until the end of the Second World War. Upon its completion, a large number of guns were sold and transferred to countries like this. called Third world. In the WB itself, 25-pound (87.6 mm) guns were in service until the end of the 70s. last century, and now remain in fireworks units.
In 1877, the inch system was introduced. At the same time, the previous sizes on the “bruce” scale had nothing to do with the new system. True, the “Bryusov” scale and artillery weight remained for some time after 1877 due to the fact that many obsolete guns remained in the army.
Example:
Notes
The caliber of aerial bombs is measured in kilograms.
See also
Wikimedia Foundation. 2010.
Artillery caliber as a term appeared in Europe in 1546, when Hartmann from Nuremberg created a prismatic tetrahedral ruler. This device is called the Hartmann scale. Units of measurement (inches) were marked on one face, and the actual dimensions (based on weight in pounds) of iron, lead and stone cores, respectively, were marked on the other three.
Examples (approximately):
- 1 face - the mark of a lead core weighing 1 pound - corresponds to 1.5 inches;
- 2nd face - iron core weighing 1 pound - s 2.5;
- 3 face - a stone core weighing 1 pound - from 3.
Knowing the size or weight of the projectile, it was possible to manufacture ammunition and complete the charge in advance. This system existed in the world for about three centuries. In Russia, unified standards did not exist until the reforms of Peter I. Army arquebuses and cannons had separate characteristics for the weight of the projectile, in Russian national units. There were guns from 1/8 hryvnia to a pound. At the beginning of the 18th century, on behalf of Peter I, a domestic caliber system was developed under the leadership of Feldzeichmeister-General Count Bruce. The Hartmann scale was taken as a basis. This system divided the guns according to the artillery weight of the projectile (cast iron core). The unit of measurement became the artillery pound - a cast iron core with a diameter of 2 inches and weighing 115 spools (approximately 490 grams). It didn’t matter what types of shells the gun fired—bombs, buckshot, or anything else. Only the theoretical artillery weight that a gun could fire given its size was taken into account. Tables were developed correlating artillery weight (caliber) with the diameter of the bore. Artillerymen were responsible for operating calibers and diameters. In the “Naval Charter” (St. Petersburg, 1720), in chapter seven “About the artillery officer, or constappel”, in paragraph 2 it is written: “You must measure the cannonballs to see if their diameters are similar to the calibers of the guns and place them on the ship according to your places." This system was introduced by royal decree in 1707 and lasted for more than a century and a half.
- 3-pounder gun, 3-pounder gun - official names;
- artillery weight 3 pounds - the main characteristic of the gun;
- size 2.8 inches - bore diameter, an auxiliary characteristic of the gun.
In practice, it was a small cannon that fired cannonballs weighing about 1.5 kg and had a caliber (in our understanding) of about 70 mm. D. E. Kozlovsky in his book gives a translation of Russian artillery weight into metric calibers:
- 3 lbs - 76 mm,
- 4 lbs - 88 mm,
- 6 lbs - 96 mm,
- 12 lbs - 120 mm,
- 18 lbs - 137 mm,
- 24 lbs - 152 mm,
- 60 lbs - 195 mm.
Explosive shells (bombs) occupied a special place in this system. Their weight was measured in poods (1 pood - 40 trade pounds - equal to approximately 16.3 kg). This is due to the fact that the bombs were hollow, with explosives inside, that is, made of materials of different densities. During their production, it was much more convenient to operate with generally accepted weight units.
D. Kozlovsky gives the following relationships:
- 1/4 pood - 120 mm,
- 1/2 - 152,
- 1 pood - 196,
- 2 - 245.v
- 3 - 273,
- 5 - 333.
A special weapon was intended for bombs - a bombard, or mortar. Its tactical and technical characteristics, combat missions and calibration system allow us to speak of a special type of artillery. In practice, small bombards often fired ordinary cannonballs, and then the same gun had different calibers - a general one of 12 pounds and a special one of 10 pounds.
The introduction of calibers, among other things, became a good financial incentive for soldiers and officers. Thus, in the “Naval Charter”, printed in St. Petersburg in 1720, in the chapter “On rewarding” the amounts of reward payments for guns taken from the enemy are given:
- 30 pound - 300 rubles,
- 24 - 250,
- 18 - 210,
- 12 - 170,
- 8 - 130,
- 6 - 90,
- 4 and 3 - 50,
- 2 and below - 15.
In the second half of the 19th century, with the introduction of rifled artillery, the scale was adjusted due to changes in the characteristics of the projectile, but the principle remained the same.