Bkf Olga Mirimskaya. One of the richest women in Russia had her stolen child returned
The prosecutor's office revs up its engines. A criminal case has been initiated against the management of OJSC Klimov
Alexandra Gritskova, Konstantin Lantratov
As Kommersant has learned, the St. Petersburg prosecutor's office opened a criminal case on the fact of abuse by the management of JSC Klimov (St. Petersburg), a leading developer of aircraft engines controlled by the Federal State Unitary Enterprise Russian Aircraft Corporation MiG. The case concerns the sale in 2004 of ten helicopter power units. The head of the United Aircraft Corporation, Alexey Fedorov, believes that the current situation “poses a serious threat to the completion of the formation process” of the United Aircraft Corporation, into which Klimov should be included as part of RSK MiG.
The St. Petersburg prosecutor's office opened a criminal case regarding abuse of official powers by the management of OJSC Klimov (Article 201 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation) on March 6. On March 20, he was transferred to the Prosecutor General's Office. The reason for the investigation was, according to the prosecutor's office, an "economically unjustified" transaction for a state-owned enterprise, carried out at the end of 2004: Klimov sold ten helicopter engines to Inkom CJSC, allegedly at a reduced price. Then, according to the investigation, Inkom CJSC resold the engines, earning about 3 million rubles.
In September 2004, the management of the Klimov plant changed: Alexander Vatagin was appointed general director instead of Alexander Bobrov. As Kommersant was told at the enterprise, these ten engines were sold to pay off wage debts. At that time, the total debt of the company was about 1 billion rubles. “The contract with ZAO Inkom was concluded to prevent bankruptcy of the enterprise,” the plant claims.
While dealing with the problems of the enterprise, the new management of Klimov OJSC revealed abuses committed by the former general director. In April 2005, the Main Investigation Department of the Main Internal Affairs Directorate of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region brought charges against Alexander Bobrov under Art. 159 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation (“Fraud”) for theft of property in the amount of 20.3 million rubles. and attempted theft of state property in the amount of 180.3 million rubles. In addition, a case was initiated against the director of Cargo-Express CJSC Oleg Kuznetsov, an intermediary company that worked with Klimov OJSC. According to the investigation, Mr. Bobrov, without the consent of RSK MiG and the Federal Agency for Industry, issued promissory notes from the plant for a total amount of more than 200 million rubles, with which he paid the company for allegedly supplied components for engines, which resulted in the formation of a “fictitious debt” of Klimov. in front of JSC "Cargo-Express".
Representatives of the enterprise associate the initiation of a criminal case against the new management of Klimov OJSC with the old bill of exchange history. The fact is that right now CJSC Cargo-Express is trying through the court to recover from OJSC Klimov 234 million rubles, which the company allegedly owes to it on bills of exchange (the amount has increased taking into account fines and penalties). The Arbitration Court of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region told Kommersant that the closed joint-stock company filed a claim against the open joint-stock company on February 22, that is, several days before the initiation of the criminal case.
The management of the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) has already intervened in the situation, into which Klimov should be included as part of RSK MiG. On March 12, UAC President Alexey Fedorov sent a letter to the Prosecutor General of the Russian Federation Yuri Chaika, in which he asked to verify the validity of the criminal case and the claims of Cargo-Express. It was after this that the Prosecutor General’s Office withdrew the criminal case from the St. Petersburg prosecutor’s office.
“The transfer of shares of JSC Klimov to the economic management of FSUE RSK MiG should ensure the process of corporatization of the MiG corporation and the inclusion of its shares in the authorized capital of UAC by April 1, 2007,” says the letter sent to the Prosecutor General. At the same time, Mr. Fedorov notes that the situation “poses a serious threat to the completion of the process of formation of the KLA.” According to Kommersant's information, a new schedule for the corporatization of RSK MiG is currently being agreed upon with the Federal Property Management Agency, which provides for the corporation's entry into the UAC no earlier than June 21.
JSC Klimov and RSK MiG believe that the criminal case is connected exclusively with the activities of the former management of the plant and the intermediary company. “I consider all current events to be the last attempt by the head of Cargo-Express JSC to evade responsibility for the actions that led the plant to a deplorable state. I think the court and the Prosecutor General’s Office will put an end to this matter,” Alexander Vatagin, general director of Klimov JSC, told Kommersant. . “The management of RSK MiG hopes that the prosecutor’s office will sort everything out,” says Elena Fedorova, head of the corporation’s public relations department.
Cargo-Express CJSC itself refrains from commenting in connection with the criminal case and legal proceedings. This may be due to the fact that the head of the company, Oleg Kuznetsov, is abroad.
However, experts note that Cargo Express itself does not have sufficient administrative and financial resources to carry out such an attack on a large state-owned enterprise. “Probably, the actions of Cargo Express are part of a broader campaign that is being waged against the Klimov plant or against RSK MiG,” says Konstantin Makienko, an expert at the Center for Analysis of Strategies and Technologies. Let us recall that at the end of last year it became known about a criminal case against the first deputy general director of RSK MiG Sergei Tsivilev, who was suspected of attempting to sell to Poland a batch of spare parts for MiG-29 fighters that did not comply with the terms of the contract. However, the Moscow Prosecutor's Office subsequently dropped charges of fraud on an especially large scale and forgery of documents, considering that they were brought prematurely.
Plant named after Klimov
The Klimov Plant (St. Petersburg) is one of the largest developers of aircraft engines in the Russian Federation. Motors were created here for most helicopters of the Mi and Ka brands, as well as for aircraft of the MiG and Il families. The plant also developed an engine for the T-80U tank, gas turbine engines for sea vessels, and mobile power plants based on them. In December 2006, it was transformed into OJSC Klimov. On March 5, 2007, by decree of the President of the Russian Federation, JSC Klimov was completely transferred to the economic management of RSK MiG as part of the formation of JSC United Aircraft Corporation.
© "Newspaper "Your Privy Councilor", 04/23/2007, "Klimov" cannot be knocked down!
How a small trading and intermediary company tried to ruin the largest aircraft engine development plant
Irina Molchanova
There is an opinion that only small money is earned with great difficulty. And millions come easily and effortlessly. The main thing is to know the “moves” by which you can pump green pieces of paper into your pocket. The word “earn” is as inappropriate here as concepts such as decency and honesty. To achieve these goals, all means are used. In the heat of financial transactions, businessmen sometimes lose all sense of reality and end up in their own networks.
The attempt to ruin the famous domestic plant “Klimov” by a certain trading and intermediary company “Cargo Express” is an excellent illustration of the frenzy of modern raiders.
The “Privy Councilor” became aware of the details of this amazing story. The scheme by which they tried to ruin the largest enterprise is simply amazing in its unprincipledness...
Attacks on state-owned enterprises
The St. Petersburg Klimov Plant is known throughout the world as a leading developer of aircraft engines of all modifications, including for MiG and SU fighters. Having survived all the shocks of the transition period, having once been on the verge of bankruptcy, Klimov still managed to maintain its unique production, which has no analogues in the entire post-Soviet space. In the last three years, the plant seemed to have found a new life - a large volume of orders was generated, a team of professionals was created, wages were increased by 50 percent, revenue increased by 2.5 times... It would seem that there is no reason for alarm. But calm came to the enterprise quite recently. After the small trading and intermediary company Cargo Express, which was making every possible attempt to ruin the largest enterprise, finally left the field of view of Klimov. Immediately after the plant was transformed into a joint-stock company owned by the state, the management of Cargo Express sharply became more active, presenting financial claims to the enterprise.
Let us immediately clarify that 100 percent of the shares of Klimov OJSC are owned by the state, and the enterprise itself is the legal successor of the Federal State Unitary Enterprise “Plant named after V. Ya. Klimov”. In this context, an attempt at ruin takes on the character of a crime not against some private company, but against state property!
But until recently, they tried to ignore this obvious fact - mainly those law enforcement agencies, on whose actions the future fate of “Klimov” directly depended...
Fake bills
Hard times began for Klimov in 2003, when the then director of the plant, Andrei Bobrov, entered into an agreement with the Cargo Express company, headed by Oleg Kuznetsov. In fact, these two people concentrated all the cash flows of the enterprise in their hands. It was so “successful” that the plant (with a complete absence of a portfolio of orders!) accumulated a huge accounts payable. Naturally, problems immediately began with the payment of wages. Tax debts also grew. Bobrov began to pay for the alleged supply of products from his main partner, CJSC Cargo Express, with promissory notes. In fact, the plant was given into bondage to creditors.
Over time, Cargo Express began to control not only deliveries, but also the plant’s raw materials and its sales. At the same time, the plant took out loans for current activities and paid the counterparty with promissory notes. By the fall of 2004, the general director of Cargo Express, Oleg Kuznetsov, made a demand for payment of money on bills, which the plant’s management was not capable of in principle - the urgent debt to creditors by that time amounted to about 800 million rubles. There could already be talk of bankruptcy. There is no need to say what would have happened to the plant after this - many Russian enterprises fell into ruin, literally cut into pieces of scrap metal.
The financial condition of the plant reached such a critical point that the Federal Agency for Industry urgently intervened in the matter. By order of the FSUE RSK MiG, Hero of the Soviet Union Alexander Vatagin was appointed general director of Klimov.
- But by that time the money had been completely withdrawn from the plant, all the raw materials belonged to Cargo-Express LLC, the current contracts with Cargo-Express LLC were concluded by the plant on enslaving conditions. “Everything had to start almost from scratch,” says Alexander Vatagin, General Director of Klimov OJSC. - The Board of Directors of JSC Klimov, which includes representatives of state-owned enterprises - RSK MiG, Oboronprom, Federal Agency for Industry, Rosoboronexport - will never approve payment on such dubious bills; not a single bill has been agreed upon with the Federal Agency for Industry . Accordingly, the obligations for
To be honest, these criminal bills could only be fulfilled by Bobrov, and not by a state enterprise.
Attempt on 230 million rubles
Throughout the three years that the new management brought Klimov out of the crisis, Kuznetsov, as director of Cargo Express, did not give up trying to get no less than 230 million rubles from the state budget, which would lead to the actual closure of the enterprise! Surprisingly, the St. Petersburg prosecutor's office, represented by Deputy Prosecutor Vladimirov, had previously tried to cancel the decision to bring the director of Cargo Express as an accused (however, a criminal case was soon opened against Kuznetsov again).
But Kuznetsov, apparently feeling such support in the St. Petersburg prosecutor's office, initiated a lawsuit in the Arbitration Court... And this despite the fact that the Main Investigation Department of the Main Internal Affairs Directorate of St. Petersburg and the Leningrad Region had already charged Bobrov with committing theft of property (the case materials have already been transferred to the court). Kuznetsov was also subject to criminal prosecution, but he escaped from investigation abroad in time and was put on the international wanted list, where he is still on the wanted list. Kuznetsov, while abroad, generally sent letters to the State Duma with an appeal to protect him from “arbitrariness”...
What did he hope for when he went to court?
“We need to understand the situation Kuznetsov found himself in,” says Alexander Vatagin. “He began writing his statements during the period when he was charged with theft of state property in the amount of 20 million rubles and attempted theft of state property in the amount of 180 million rubles. He tried by any means to avoid criminal liability. I believe that there was also a motive of revenge against the management of Klimov...
Matvienko stood up for Klimov
It is quite obvious that payment on fictitious bills is impossible in principle. The state did not give the green light to these transactions, which directly threatened our entire aviation industry. The issuance of these bills was not agreed upon with the owner of the plant - the Russian Federation represented by the federal agency, therefore these transactions are void.
In his appeal to the General Prosecutor's Office, the head of the FAP, Boris Aleshin, directly spoke about the threat of the seizure of Klimov - that attempts were made to collapse the criminal cases against Kuznetsov and Bobrov. Only after this did Russian Prosecutor General Yuri Chaika take personal control of the investigation.
We will be able to see the denouement of this almost detective story in the near future, when not only Bobrov, but also Kuznetsov will appear in court.
The anti-raider commission created under Vice-Governor Oseevsky got involved in the case.
“The government will protect the interests of the enterprise,” he said.
Governor Valentina Matvienko has already intervened in the conflict and supported the position of the current leadership of Klimov.
Today, on Monday, the day the Privy Councilor is published, the head of the Federal Agency for Industry, Boris Aleshin, will come to St. Petersburg. In Smolny, with the participation of the governor and representatives of federal executive bodies of state power, they will talk about the state of enterprises of the military-industrial complex of St. Petersburg. The attempt to seize the Klimov plant will be discussed first...
From the TS dossier
OJSC Klimov is a unique developer of aircraft engines used on front-line aircraft and 90 percent of the helicopter fleet of the Russian Federation, the official supplier of engines for helicopters of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, the Federal Security Service and the President of the Russian Federation. The portfolio of orders of JSC Klimov includes work on the implementation of contracts of the MiG Corporation and Rosoboronexport with the strategic partners of the Russian Federation in the field of military-technical cooperation - India and China. Today, JSC Klimov is the only state-owned enterprise producing engines for domestic helicopters.
The Klimov plant is being promoted to the head of helicopter engine production
Irina Bychina
Yesterday, the head of the Federal Agency for Industry, Boris Aleshin, and the city governor, Valentina Matvienko, held a meeting of heads of enterprises of the military-industrial complex of St. Petersburg. It was expected that on the same day the city administration and JSC Klimov would sign an agreement on organizing the production of TV3-117 and VK-2500 helicopter engines in the Northern capital. This did not happen, but Mr. Aleshin confirmed that the St. Petersburg enterprise would be the main developer and one of the sites for organizing their production in Russia.
According to Kommersant's information, the signing of the agreement was postponed until approximately the beginning of May, so as not to “confuse” the two events. Nevertheless, the head of the Federal Agency for Industry, Boris Aleshin, told reporters that the St. Petersburg enterprise will become one of the sites for organizing serial production of engines in Russia. The TV3-117 VMA engine is the base engine for all Russian attack and military transport helicopters of the Mi and Ka families, and its modernized version - the VK-2500 engine - has even greater power resources. Today, the Ukrainian JSC Motor Sich is engaged in serial production of these engines. The St. Petersburg plant produces small batches of such engines using components produced in Ukraine.
The Klimov Plant (St. Petersburg) is one of the largest developers of aircraft engines in the Russian Federation. Motors were created here for most helicopters of the Mi and Ka brands, as well as for aircraft of the MiG and Il families. The plant also developed an engine for the T-80U tank, gas turbine engines for sea vessels, and mobile power plants based on them. In December 2006, it was transformed into OJSC Klimov. On March 5, 2007, by decree of the President of the Russian Federation, JSC Klimov was completely transferred to the economic management of RSK MiG as part of the formation of JSC United Aircraft Corporation.
The decision to establish serial production of engines in Russia was made by the Russian government so that domestic helicopter manufacturers do not depend on foreign suppliers, and also in connection with the prospect of Ukraine joining NATO, after which control over part of the purchased products may be lost. The project involves government funding within the framework of the targeted federal program "Development of the military-industrial complex for 2007-2015 and for the period until 2025." Let us recall that among the contenders for the creation of the site were three main Russian manufacturers: the Moscow Chernyshev Plant, the Ufa Engine Production Association (UMPO) and OJSC Klimov.
Back in November 2006, the military-industrial commission, headed by Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov, recommended that the government organize serial production of helicopter engines at UMPO OJSC. However, yesterday Mr. Aleshin announced that the lead developer and one of the production sites will be Klimov OJSC. The second site, according to Kommersant, will be the Moscow Chernyshev Plant. According to JSC Klimov itself, creating an engine assembly plant will require 3 billion rubles, most of which will be received from the federal budget. However, yesterday Mr. Aleshin did not undertake to name the final dates for the formation of the engine-building holding. In general, following the meeting, the head of the Russian industry agency noted the successful dynamics of the development of St. Petersburg enterprises, adding only that he wants to see the defense-industrial complex more diversified.
Gone into a tailspin
The attempted raider takeover of the Klimov plant failed: one defendant is in the dock, the other is on the international wanted list
Irina Molchanova
According to these enterprising businessmen, the St. Petersburg aircraft engine plant owes them 230 million rubles! In an effort to return this money, the attackers actively used the St. Petersburg prosecutor's office and State Duma deputies... Moreover, one of the entrepreneurs at that time was on the international wanted list, hiding from Russian justice, and the other was awaiting a court verdict. But the attack on the plant failed ingloriously.
Two directors
The names of these entrepreneurs will not tell anyone anything. A certain Bobrov and a certain Kuznetsov. But these people are far from simple. You must have remarkable abilities to pull off a scam that could threaten the ruin of a state-owned enterprise working for the defense industry!
The Klimov Plant is a leading developer of aircraft engines of all modifications, including for MiG and SU fighters. Klimov is the official supplier of engines for helicopters of the Russian Ministry of Defense, the Federal Security Service and the President of the Russian Federation. The Russian aircraft manufacturing corporation MiG associates the future of fighters only with the Klimov plant, which is the developer of the power plant, including the unique RD-33 with a deflectable thrust vector, which makes foreign experts delighted.
It is more than strange that the work of such an enterprise could be made dependent on the activities of two entrepreneurs. The first, former plant director Andrei Bobrov, is today accused of abuse of office and fraud and is awaiting a court verdict. The second, Oleg Kuznetsov, director of the trading and purchasing company Cargo Express, is hiding from the investigation and is therefore on the international wanted list.
Bill of exchange scheme
History is silent about who had the cunning plan in his head (Kuznetsov or Bobrov), thanks to which it became possible to receive 230 million rubles from the state budget into his personal pocket. In 2003, Bobrov entered into an agreement with Cargo Express through its general director Kuznetsov. Under this agreement, the plant paid for the supply of products from its main partner, CJSC Cargo-Express, with bills of exchange. Over time, Cargo Express began to control not only deliveries, but also the plant’s raw materials and their sales. At the same time, the plant took out loans for current activities and paid the counterparty with promissory notes.
This is how the company’s fictitious debt to Cargo Express for supposedly supplied aircraft engines was formalized. Kuznetsov received bills for the amount of the “debt” of bills and began to demand “his” from the new management of the plant.
Ruined farm
The authorities then abruptly intervened in the situation. By the end of 2004, Bobrov was removed from office. Kuznetsov also left the factory territory.
The plant had to be urgently brought out of the crisis. The total accounts payable alone amounted to about 800 million rubles. The role of anti-crisis manager was taken on by the hero of the Soviet Union Alexander Vatagin.
The enterprise was on the verge of collapse, - Alexander Ivanovich recalls that time. - Huge debts have arisen: to the budget, to creditors. The company's balance sheets were such that all banks refused to give us a loan. People were not paid wages for three months. 80-100 people left per month! But as a result, we were able to convince the team that we came to the plant for a long time and with a specific goal - to give Klimov an impetus for development.
By the end of 2004, it was established that the documents for the supply of engines were falsified, and the bills received for this supply had not yet been agreed upon with the Federal Agency for Industry, the 100 percent owner of the state-owned enterprise Klimov. The plant was forced to contact law enforcement agencies.
“Klimov” is no longer threatened
The Main Investigation Department became involved in the case - the investigation took about a year. As a result, criminal cases were initiated regarding theft of property on a large scale. At one time it seemed that Kuznetsov could evade responsibility. The then deputy prosecutor of St. Petersburg, Vladimirov, canceled the decision to bring the director of Cargo Express as an accused. Apparently, this fact inspired Kuznetsov himself so much (why, such support!) that he filed a lawsuit in the Arbitration Court: 230 million rubles from the state budget did not give him peace.
Only after the personal intervention of the Prosecutor General of Russia Yuri Chaika, the situation received its logical continuation. The criminal case against Kuznetsov was reopened, and Bobrov awaited trial.
And the other day in Smolny there was a meeting between the head of the Federal Agency for Industry Boris Aleshin, Governor Valentina Matvienko, Vice-Governor Mikhail Oseevsky with the heads of enterprises of the military-industrial complex of St. Petersburg.
Today, nothing and no one threatens the Klimov plant. We will continue to support him at both the federal and regional levels,” Boris Aleshin said at the briefing.
JSC "Klimov"- one of the leading Russian developers of gas turbine engines. Engaged in the development, support of serial production and servicing of engines for most Mil and Kamov helicopters, and jet engines for fighter aircraft. It is part of the United Engine Corporation - a 100% specialized subsidiary of OJSC OPK Oboronprom for managing engine-building assets. It is part of the Rostec state corporation.
Encyclopedic YouTube
1 / 4
✪ Business card of JSC "Klimov"
✪ Nikolay Kuznetsov. Delayed triumph. Part I
✪ Anniversary exposition of the United Engine Corporation at MFD-2018
✪ Specialists of the future (SPO) - Issue 1
Subtitles
Story
The company traces its history back to the formation of a society in St. Petersburg in 1912, which was called: "French Society of Automobile Enthusiasts Renault for Russia".
But only on October 20, 1914, with the highest permission of Emperor Nicholas II, the decision was made to open the Renault plant. By this time, the First World War was in full swing and the priority of the newly formed plant was the production of equipment for the front. The first military order was placed for Renault 12F engines, which were installed on cars and aircraft.
In Petrograd in the early 20s. POGARZ (Petrograd United State Automobile Repair Plant) was formed, which included the production premises of the former Ivan Breitigam body shops, as well as the buildings of the Petrograd branch of the former Russian Renault plant. POGARZ carried out major repairs of cars and, as follows from an advertisement in 1923, manufactured car engines.
After the onset of Soviet power, the plant continued its activities in the same direction. In 1924, the plant put into operation the M-24 flying boat with a Renault engine.
In 1929, the plant began serial production of spare parts for engines for Fordson-Putilovets, Caterpillar, John Reed, and International tractors.
In 1930, the plant began developing and serial production of motorcycles L-300, L-500, L-8 and S-1.
In 1931-1932, the plant organized in-line production of 37-mm armor-piercing shells.
In the period 1932-1936, the plant carried out serial production of components for T-26 tanks, and also adapted M-5 aircraft engines (Licensed version of the Liberty L-12 engine) for installation on BT-2 and BT-5 tanks.
May 1, 1947 In Moscow, the first parade with the participation of jet aircraft took place over Red Square, in which Yak-15 fighters with RD-10 engines, developed by V. Ya. Klimov, took part.
In 1951-1952, the VK-5, VK-5F, and VK-7 engines were developed.
In 1951, the VK-2 turboprop engine was created for the aircraft of A. N. Tupolev and S. V. Ilyushin. On February 16, 1952, the first tests of the MiG-17F with the VK-1F engine with an afterburner took place. On February 17, 1952, the first flight of the Il-28 R reconnaissance aircraft with the VK-5 engine took place. May 30, 1952 - first flight of the R-1 seaplane.
In 1956, the first VK-3 bypass engine was developed for the I-ZU high-altitude supersonic fighter. The first engine with cooled turbine blades VK-13 was developed. In the 60s, liquid jet engines were developed and produced for strategic missile systems, anti-aircraft missiles, as well as engines for orbital aircraft systems within the framework of the Spiral program.
In 1962, the GTD-350 engine and the VR-2 main gearbox for the V-2 helicopter were developed.
In 1964, the TV2-117 engine and the VR-8 main gearbox were developed for the V-8A helicopter. In the same year, 1964, the GTD-350 engine was installed on a railway leading car and a hovercraft.
In the mid-90s, the company's specialists created modifications of this engine RD-33N, RD-93 and the box of aircraft units KSA-52, KSA-53, KSA-54 for single-engine foreign fighters "Mirage F-1" and "Super 7" .
At the end of the 90s, a unique design of a supersonic adjustable jet nozzle with a deflectable thrust vector (OVT) was developed for the RD-33 engine.
In the 1990s - early 2000s, one of the areas of the plant’s work was the creation of modular power plants based on aircraft gas turbine engines of its own design.
In 1997, the company completed certification of the TV7-117S turboprop engine for the IL-114 local airline passenger aircraft. In 2000-2002 a modification TV7-117SM with an electronic automatic control and control unit (BARC) was created.
Since 1998, the development and production of BARK has been a separate and very significant area of activity of the enterprise. To date, 8 modifications of the BARK have been created for power plants of aircraft and helicopters for military and civil purposes.
In 2001, state tests were carried out on the VK-2500 turboshaft engine, which is a further development of the TV3-117 engine family and is intended for installation on new and modernized middle-class helicopters of the Mil and Kamov enterprises.
Since 2004, the company has been carrying out a complex of work on the RD-33MK engine with increased thrust. Since 2006 - takes part in the development of fifth-generation turbofan engines, carries out research work on the creation of advanced APUs and ignition systems,
In December 2006, the enterprise changed its form of ownership and became an open joint-stock company "Klimov", 100% of the shares of which belong to OJSC OPK "Oboronprom".
59.983889 , 30.336389OJSC "Klimov"- one of the leading Russian developers of gas turbine engines. Engaged in the development, support of serial production and servicing of engines for most Mil and Kamov helicopters, and jet engines for fighter aircraft. It is part of the United Engine Corporation - a 100% specialized subsidiary of OJSC OPK Oboronprom for managing engine-building assets.
Story
The company traces its history back to the formation of a society in St. Petersburg in 1912, which was called: "French Society of Automobile Enthusiasts Renault for Russia".
But only on October 20, 1914, with the highest permission of Emperor Nicholas II, the decision was made to open the Renault plant. By this time, the First World War was in full swing and the priority of the newly formed plant was the production of equipment for the front. The first military order was placed for Renault 12F engines, which were installed on cars and aircraft.
In Petrograd in the early 20s. POGARZ (Petrograd United State Automobile Repair Plant) was formed, which included the production premises of the former Ivan Breitigam body shops, as well as the buildings of the Petrograd branch of the former Russian Renault plant. POGARZ carried out major repairs of cars and, as follows from an advertisement in 1923, manufactured car engines.
After the onset of Soviet power, the plant continued its activities in the same direction. In 1924, the plant put into operation the M-24 flying boat with a Renault engine.
In 1927, the Red October plant merged with the Leningrad United State Automobile Repair Plant (formerly the Russian Renault plant).
In 1929, the plant began mass production of spare parts for engines for the Forzon-Putilovets, Caterpillar, John Reed, and International tractors.
In 1930, the plant began developing and mass producing motorcycles L-300, L-500, L-8 and S-1.
In 1931-1932, the plant organized in-line production of 37-mm armor-piercing shells.
In the period 1932-1936, the plant carried out serial production of components for T-26 tanks, and also adapted M-5 aircraft engines (Licensed version of the Liberty L-12 engine) for installation on BT-2 and BT-5 tanks.
May 1, 1947 In Moscow, the first parade with the participation of jet aircraft took place over Red Square, in which Yak-15 fighters with RD-10 engines, developed by V. Ya. Klimov, took part.
In 1951-1952, the VK-5, VK-5F, and VK-7 engines were developed.
Activity
The company is located at three production sites:
- Not far from these facilities there is a stadium owned by the plant (2 hectares).
- Site in the Shuvalovo area (15 hectares).
Owners and management
Notes
Links
Categories:
- Companies by alphabet
- Aircraft manufacturing companies in Russia
- Enterprises of St. Petersburg
- USSR design bureaus
- Design bureaus of Russia
Wikimedia Foundation.
2010.
See what “Klimov (company)” is in other dictionaries:
JSC "Klimov" Location, St. Petersburg JSC "Klimov" is an engine-building enterprise in St. Petersburg, a significant enterprise in the aviation industry. Contents... Wikipedia
Location, St. Petersburg JSC Klimov is an engine-building enterprise in St. Petersburg, a significant enterprise in the aviation industry. Contents... Wikipedia
OJSC Chicken Kingdom Year of foundation 1997 Location ... Wikipedia
The significance of the subject of the article is called into question. Please show in the article the significance of its subject by adding evidence of significance according to private criteria of significance or, in the case of private criteria of significance for... ... Wikipedia
Badge of the laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation The State Prize of the Russian Federation has been awarded since 1992 by the President of the Russian Federation for contribution to the development of science and technology, literature and art, for outstanding... ... Wikipedia
Badge of the laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation The State Prize of the Russian Federation has been awarded since 1992 by the President of the Russian Federation for contribution to the development of science and technology, literature and art, for outstanding... ... Wikipedia
Badge of the laureate of the State Prize of the Russian Federation The State Prize of the Russian Federation has been awarded since 1992 by the President of the Russian Federation for contribution to the development of science and technology, literature and art, for outstanding... ... Wikipedia
Development and production of gas turbine engines.
Contact faces
Alexander Ivanovich Vatagin - Executive Director
Alexey Vladimirovich Grigoriev - General Designer
Denis Mikhailovich Vaneev - HR Director
Dmitry Ivanovich Tverdokhleb - Director for Economics and Finance
Historical reference:
The company was founded in 1914 as a joint stock company "Russian Renault". Through the efforts of outstanding domestic designers V.Ya. Klimova and S.P. Izotov created a unique design school of gas turbine engine building. The company is the developer of the first domestic VK-1 turbojet engine, the RD-33 turbojet engine for the world famous MiG-29 fighter, TV3-117/VK-2500 turboshaft engines and main gearboxes installed on 95% of domestic helicopters. The company’s specialists created the GTD-1250 engine for the famous T-80 tank, a power plant, and an automatic control system (ACS). The company's assets include the development and production of relay torches for the 1980 Moscow Olympics.
Other:
JSC Klimov is part of the United Engine Corporation, a 100% subsidiary of OJSC OPK OBORONPROM for managing engine-building assets.
Participation in associations
OBORONPROM Corporation is a diversified industrial and investment group in the field of mechanical engineering and high technology. It is part of the state corporation "Russian Technologies" (Rostec). The corporation was founded in 2002. Products: helicopters, aircraft engines, gas pumping stations, air defense systems.
Enterprises in the group: 19
Enterprises in the group: 9
The International Association "Union of Aviation Engine Manufacturing" is a voluntary union of manufacturers and consumers of high-tech products. It includes almost all of the world's largest aircraft engine companies, which have great authority and master the highest art of creating, producing and operating the most complex technical devices, such as an aircraft engine. The Association is the optimal structure that coordinates the implementation of requirements for aircraft engines throughout the entire life cycle. ASSAD - was created in February on the initiative of 58 enterprises and organizations and registered on May 31, 1991 (certificate of the Moscow Registration Chamber 003.076). Within the framework of ASSAD, 91 companies of various profiles work with us, representing Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, the USA, England, France, Germany, Canada and Switzerland - research, development, serial, repair state, joint-stock and private companies engaged in the creation , production, repair and service maintenance of aircraft engines and assemblies for them, auxiliary power units, drives for gas pumping and power plants, recycling of aircraft engines, as well as a large range of consumer goods (engines for cars, boat engines, snowmobiles, walk-behind tractors and cultivators and many other products). The Association closely cooperates with the Russian Aviation and Space Agency, the Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology of the Russian Federation, the Ministry of Defense (Air Force) of the Russian Federation, and the Aviation Register of the Interstate Aviation Committee.
The other day I read a pathetic article about how the thief and human trafficker Svetlana Bespyatova had been exposed.
Who did she steal? The girl she carried and gave birth to.
Svetlana Bezpyatova is a surrogate mother. This was her fourth birth for strangers. She lives in Crimea, she has a husband and a 15-year-old daughter.
This time the child was ordered by businesswoman Olga Mirimskaya and general director of the Golden Crown payment system Nikolai Smirnov.
Olga Mirimskaya is the daughter of a Soviet aircraft designer, she was born in 1963 in the city of Zhukovsk, Moscow region. In 1985 she graduated from the Moscow Institute of National Economy. Plekhanov.
After receiving an MBA degree in the USA in 1993, she came to Menatep Bank, where her husband Alexey Golubovich already worked.
At that time, privatization was underway and the bank bought various assets for pennies, including food enterprises (experimental plant of food concentrates "Colossus", Moscow food plant, Detchinsky plant of vegetable concentrates), which were then contributed to the capital of JSC "Russian Product" (owned brands “Moscow Potato”, “Hercules”, etc.).
In 2000, Mirimskaya and her managers bought a controlling stake in the company. Today she is the chairman of the board of directors of BKF bank. She divorced the former director of strategic planning and corporate finance of YUKOS, Alexei Golubovich. She is also considered a friend of Khodorkovsky.
Several years ago, Mirimskaya sued Golubovich for the right to own a mansion on the banks of the Thames worth $10 million. Then British journalists who followed the process wrote that the ex-spouses “became the first foreign dynasty, two generations of which turned to the English courts for help in divorce proceedings.” A little earlier, their son Ilya sued his ex-wife in London, who eventually received $4.5 million from the oligarch’s heir.
Another incident that was widely reported in the foreign press involved a ring worth $3.6 million. Having received jewelry from D&M Capital Group during her visit to London, the businesswoman did not pay for it, but hastily returned to Moscow. The head of the jewelry company had to come to Moscow in person, but even then he was not able to get his money back right away
Mirimskaya has three children
Nikolay Smirnov is a US citizen. He is the Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Zolotaya Korona payment system, and was the Chairman of the Board of the National Payment Council Association.
I wonder how many years younger he is than his wife?
Mirimskaya could no longer become a mother for the fourth time - she had to resort to surrogacy. And the egg was lent by my own daughter. (http://www.compromat.ru/page_36753.htm)
While the surrogate mother was carrying the child, the couple quarreled and divorced.
Next, Smirnov persuaded Bezpyataya to issue a birth certificate for the girl in his name and in the name of her husband and go with the child to Cyprus.
Next, he planned to deprive Bezpyatnaya of parental rights, as a bad mother (with her consent), and to prove his genetic relationship with the child himself, because he really is her father.
According to Russian law, the mother of a child is the woman who gave birth to him. She receives a birth certificate, but she is registered at the registry office on the basis of this certificate and the surrogacy agreement with the consent of all parties.
Until now, in cases of disagreement between the surrogate mother and her clients, the courts have made decisions in favor of the woman who gave birth to the child.
In 2010, Zinaida Rakova entered into a surrogacy agreement with genetic parents from the Tula region. But after giving birth, she realized that she could not part with the child, and refused to give him to someone else’s family, registering the baby at the registry office as her own. The genetic parents filed a lawsuit. The protracted series of proceedings ended with a refusal verdict from the highest appellate body - the Constitutional Court - only in 2012.
Then the court stated that “the legally provided right of a surrogate mother to give consent to have her genetic parents recorded as her parents means that she has the opportunity to record herself as the child’s mother in the child’s birth certificate,... thereby stipulating for the woman who gave birth child, rights and responsibilities of the mother." In other words, from the point of view of the panel of the Constitutional Court, the surrogate mother is precisely the real mother.
In the case of Mirimskaya, all courts ruled in her favor. All this lasted 2 years.
At this time, Bezpyataya lived as a nanny for a girl in Cyprus, under the protection of bodyguards. Smirnov assigned her own daughter to study in Cyprus, Smirnov paid Bezpyataya herself 800 thousand rubles, and she received another 1 million 200 from Mirimskaya as a fee. However, the numbers need to be checked. Perhaps they include all services for IVF, pregnancy and childbirth support.
While the trials were ongoing, the situation changed several times. There was even a moment when the Cyprus court (and the proceedings took place in Moscow and Cyprus) wanted to arrest Mirimskaya for presenting a false surrogacy agreement.
Last fall, children's rights advocate Astakhov spoke out against Mirimskaya: “The decision is contrary to the law. First of all, it is contrary to the interests of the child who was born to this woman. She is the mother of this child. And, naturally, they cannot be separated. Therefore, I believe that the child should continue to live with the mother who gave birth to him,”- said Children's Ombudsman Pavel Astakhov. “This is nonsense in the legal practice of modern Russia, when the court of first instance suddenly recognized motherhood for a woman who was not even a donor of biological material, that is, not her egg was used. Our legislation establishes the priority of the woman who carried and gave birth to a child,”- noted the Ombudsman.
They write that a representative of the medical institution in which the procedures necessary for surrogacy were allegedly carried out, as part of the process to invalidate the agreement, denied the fact that such an agreement had been concluded. And the doctor, allegedly mentioned in the contract, was found dead some time ago. The cause of death, as determined by experts, was “medication overdose.”
Now Bezpyataya is wanted by Interpol for human trafficking. But the girl is with her father, Smirnov, now in Kyiv, and I don’t know where Bespyataya is. There was a program where she told all this. She says that she is tired of being the third wheel in the quarrel between her ex-spouses. Journalists found it somewhere - I didn’t look?
The tone of articles in the media has changed to the opposite.
“There is a scientific fact, confirmed by forensic examination: Svetlana Bezpyataya is not the biological mother of the girl born. The child is a stranger!. What are you talking about? What about adopted children? What about those women who carried a child themselves but used a donor egg? And even in surrogacy, customers often use donor biomaterial rather than their own.
The child is registered to the woman who gave birth to him - and goodbye.
“The Russian courts thoroughly examined all the circumstances and confirmed that Svetlana Bezpyataya, to call a spade a spade, is an impostor and has no rights to be called the girl’s mother, especially since the donor of the biomaterial, N. Smirnov, has no rights to the child.”, writes Komsomolskaya Pravda. These people are already completely crazy.
Smirnov is Mirimskaya’s former common-law husband, and not a “sperm donor.” What kind of meanness?
He has more rights in this story than Mirimskaya, because he is the biological father of the child, and she is just a grandmother. Then her daughter, the egg donor, should sue.
Why Smirnov did not immediately declare his rights as a father is what I do not understand in this story. Was the agreement concluded without his participation? And, in general, what’s with this agreement? Was he there or not? The head physician of the DeltaMedClinic clinic testified that there was no agreement on surrogacy. Compiled later? But this is already a violation.
And I don’t understand why Mirimskaya is considered the mother of the child, and he should be given to her? Because she entered into an agreement, i.e. did you pay money? Isn't this human trafficking? Why is Bespyataya accused of human trafficking?
All this is some kind of complete nonsense and hypocrisy. It turns out that the one who has more money is right, and nothing else.
And why are they so indifferent to Smirnov’s rights to his own child? He has been with the girl for 2 years and has sacrificed a lot to be with her. This is his own daughter. So why is he called a “sperm donor”? What disgusting! Any man then becomes a sperm donor for his children.
In the case of surrogacy, then both genetic parents are donors if they have germ cells suitable for the birth of an embryo. And the egg is no more important than the sperm.
But often the sperm is from the husband, and the egg is from a stranger. Sometimes it’s a complete stranger, sometimes it’s a sister or daughter.
Surrogacy turned everything upside down. Now it is completely impossible to understand who the child's parent is.
New concepts have appeared: “biological mother”, “surrogate mother”. We would also need a “donor mother”, “legal mother” and “mother-educator”.
And the father, by the way, remained a father. Although the concept of “biological father” has appeared, this is what they say about any father who does not recognize the child or is deprived of parental rights.
Who will be the mother for the child that a rich woman ordered from a company, and was given to her after 9 months, and he was conceived in a test tube from a donor egg and donor sperm? He will be fed by a nurse, and raised by nannies and tutors.
What will be this woman's maternal involvement as a mother? The fact that documents have been drawn up for her, and that she pays money to teachers? Is the mother the one who pays? Nonsense.
We need to go back to the beginning. A mother is the one who gave birth and/or raised. There is no need for surrogacy agreements. It is necessary to give the right of adoption in the event of abandonment of a child to those in whose favor this abandonment will be. Those. a woman carries a child for others, immediately abandons it, and the clients adopt it.
To avoid deception, you can draw up a loan agreement under the condition that the woman returns the money if she does not abandon the child.
Is there a risk? Eat. But he still exists. But there won’t be this schizophrenia with incomprehensible mothers: “surrogate”, “Biological”, “actual”, “legal”. Mother is mother. And period.
P.S. The Cassation Board of the Supreme Court upheld the complaint of Svetlana Bezpyataya, the mother of minor Sofia Bezpyataya, and overturned all previous decisions recognizing the banker’s maternal rights.
As Svetlana Bezpyataya’s lawyer told Pravo.ru, following today’s hearing, the Supreme Court upheld her complaint and overturned previous decisions in the case involving banker Olga Mirimskaya. According to lawyer Renat Kurbanov, the court agreed to annul the previous decisions and sent the case for review.
“This means that the mother of little Sofia, according to the law, is only Svetlana Bezpyataya, the woman who gave birth to the child. In this regard, we hope that the Investigative Committee will follow the logic of the Supreme Court and the letter of the law,” the defender told Pravo.ru.
Well, that's great! It was some kind of nonsense. That’s why yesterday articles appeared simultaneously in “KP”, “MK” and a television program where Mirimskaya’s correctness was defended.